A struggle + Chess.com analysis

This was a very tough and even game, so I plugged it into the cpu analysis, and this morning I got the results. They seem accurate on some occasions though I think the computer is a  bit fast to assign an inaccuracy to a move. What are your thoughts ?

nice game!

Black doesnt play too well, anyway good game

I wouldn't hardly call it an even game. White had been dominating ever since the opening and just needed a moment to take full advantage of his superior position (ex. penetration via open/semi open file, King/Queen side attack, Sac leading to a mating attack, etc....). Some of his largest mistakes were 2...Ba6, 4...Qc8, 9...Nb8, 11...Nh5, 12...a6, 16...Bg7, 31...c5, and 40...Qxb3 (I may have missed something so please do not just attack me all you want). While some of you mistakes were 7.a3, 13.d5, 27.Qg2 and 37.Rxa6 (Again I'm not assuring my analysis is correct). I don't agree with the Comp saying that Rd3 and Rhd1 or b4 and Rdc4 mistakes/inaccuracies as the computer doesn't see the positional advantage of the rooks penetrating into Black's position through rook lifts. Anyways, you played well and deserved that win.

37 Qc7+ followed by Rxa5++

(a little cleaner)

you did well regardless

Ouch, I just noticed that. Could have cost me the game. I need to stop missing obvious mates, even though it worked out well in the end.

The standard ~2200 computer analysis isn't all that impressive. It's about equilvant to Fritz 6 blunder check, so only really take notice of what it thinks are mistakes or blunders. It also doesn't use a opening book as far as I can tell, so will for example evaluate most standard open sicilian positions as more than 1/2 pawn advantage for white, whatever that means :).