Analyze help!

very suspicious.....looks like an engine of some type was used.

Of course he thinks you are cheating. First there are some pretty nice tactics (I presume this was a blitz game?). Then he wins some material just to figure out he has walked into a "perpetual" (if he wants it). When he decides to try to avoid the perpetual he finds himself in a situation where he yields some material back, and in the end losing. All our losses, fellow chessplayers, due to own stupidity - MUST be due to cheating! [Insert irony wherever needed.]

First off I think that accusing me of cheating and outright offending me with curse words (which is what happened in the blitz game with Meliti_plays_chess) was unnecessary. I just analyzed it through Rybka and my little "fireworks" exploded sideways. It should have failed.

Black didn't play a perfect defense, which made it easy for me to play an attack. For example, 30... Ne7! covers g8 then  31...Qd5! stops mate and keeps the material.

His evidence was that i 'beat' Fritz at 2600. seriously? that makes  me ask.. how did he know?   I was in fact playing this game on a different computer from my normal - the "bare" computer I would say, no games, no programs, nothing on it. So I couldn't use Rybka.

Once again, stop accusing people of cheating. not cool

thanks bro!

You're welcome, it's always a pleasure to help!

Haha! I've been a victim of your "fireworks" and idt that it was a computer. Really? i've encountered butts on LC before too, but accusing someone with your rating of cheating after a brilliant attack? PA-THE-TIC.

a footnote, he was playing the cozio defense, which is theoretically bad. he should expect to lose!

 Not that hig level, easy tactics, black's tactical vision is really bad.

But it's was a fun game :)