How did you annotate the game? If it was you handing out the question marks, at depth 30, Stockfish makes no blunders, if it seems weird to you, it is because you are not depth 30 Stockfish.
Battle of the Engines: Stockfish 15 vs. Komodo 25!
Sort:
UwU
Team Stockfish all the way
stockfish
is the
best
clearly
Stockfish is the king.
All Hail King Stockfish!
Leela is god
DiamondXmen wrote:
Hello Everyone I decided to run a little experiment on Chess.com's hardest engine (Komodo 25) difficulty at 3200 rated... How did I test this? Simple I used the program "ChessBase2017" and downloaded the highest rated Engine (Stockfish 15) at 3541 and let it sit for a few minutes, then I would pick the move with the greatest advantage... The result was a very interesting game that I think you'll all enjoy.
Your annotations are wrong. You're using game review and eval bar to annotate moves however:
- Traditional Game Review runs on VERY low depth, making best moves as inaccuracies commonly. Even with upgraded game review (diamond membership), its still not very strong
- Eval bar uses web-based stockfish light, of a older version. Basically a direct downgrade of Stockfish 15 in every aspect.
The "blunders" marked are wrong, and you can't really annotate these games because no move is really "blunders" and its impossible to tell which move was a good or bad move. The only conclusion that could be drawn is the stockfish can win against Komodo with the White Pieces
I may be biased, but I think Stockfish will reign supreme.
Show this to a new chess player and say its Magnus vs kasparov
how to battle of engines? can anyone teach me?
Hello Everyone I decided to run a little experiment on Chess.com's hardest engine (Komodo 25) difficulty at 3200 rated... How did I test this? Simple I used the program "ChessBase2017" and downloaded the highest rated Engine (Stockfish 15) at 3541 and let it sit for a few minutes, then I would pick the move with the greatest advantage... The result was a very interesting game that I think you'll all enjoy.