You didn't even name the players. It doesn't look like a brilliancy award winner. Plus, you have the most annoying background music ever.
BRILLIANCY PRIZE IN 1933 HAS AN IDENTICAL GAME IN 1900
Sort:
Dec 2, 2018
0
#3
notmtwain wrote:
You didn't even name the players. It doesn't look like a brilliancy award winner.
SORRY. The book has shown no name either
NonMasterOfNone wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
You didn't even name the players. It doesn't look like a brilliancy award winner.
SORRY. The book has shown no name either
What book?
Dec 2, 2018
0
#5
notmtwain wrote:
NonMasterOfNone wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
You didn't even name the players. It doesn't look like a brilliancy award winner.
SORRY. The book has shown no name either
What book?
the fireside book of chess
Dec 2, 2018
0
#6
It only took me 10 seconds to find the names of the players and the book: Menges - Gitzen 1935.
How did that win a brilliancy prize? Standard kingside attack.
Dec 2, 2018
0
#8
JamesColeman wrote:
It only took me 10 seconds to find the names of the players and the book: Menges - Gitzen 1935.
but in the book it was 1933 hmm? anyways i will put that on the description.. it's appreciated
The 1900 game was Frank Marshall Amos Burn. Comments by Marshall on Chessgames.
Another Chernev book says the brilliancy was Mentges Gitzen 1913.
Dec 2, 2018
0
#10
notmtwain wrote:
The 1900 game was Frank Marshall Amos Burn. Comments by Marshall on Chessgames.
Another Chernev book says the brilliancy was Mentges Gitzen 1913.
interesting.... but the most catching is the game was simple yet awarded
WATCH: https://youtu.be/groQta1wYfQ