Bxh7, the Greek gift sacrifice

Sort:
Avatar of stryik

Hey chess.com,

Just finished what I thought was a great example of a Colle sacrifice - take a look! (And please point out something that I missed, if I did :x)

Avatar of davidcarlson

nice

Avatar of KillaBeez

After Kg6, I would have played Qg4 with all sorts of nastiness threatened.  Black should have played Re8 after Qh5 and maybe he can hold.  But you still get the better position regardless.  Nice game!

Avatar of mathijs

Killabeez, 13...Re8 allows a typical mate: 14.Qxf7+ Kh8 15.Qh5+ Kg8 16.Qh7+ Kf8 17.Qh8+ Ke7 18.Qxg7#. After 12...Kg6 13.Qg4 indeed seems best, and very convincing.

Nice sac, by all appearances completely sound.

Avatar of atomichicken

Nice game. Just so you know move 4 e4 is not actually the best, because on move 5 he could have played e5 with a good position, so 4 Nf3 is actually a better move taking control of e5 and so e4 cannot be prevented next move and you will get a full pawn centre and it will be impossible for him to challenge it with such moves as e5. When gaining a 'big' centre the most important thing you should consider is if your opponent can challenge it with such a move.

Avatar of mathijs

One remark about the opening: 4.e4 was too soon. Black could have played 5...e5, when he is in fine shape after 6.dxe5 Qxd1+ 7.Kxd1 Pg4, threatening both Nf2+ and Nxe5. You should have played 4.Nf3 first, which leads to positions similar to those in the game.

 

Edit: Atomic chicken, you just beat me to it.

Avatar of stryik

atomichicken - Good point about 4. Nf3, I haven't played that before. It just always seemed like gaining time via kicking the knight was a good strategy - I'll play Nf3 the next time I see Nxd5 and see what happens.

Avatar of atomichicken

Yeah I used to just play e4 without a moments thought until recently it's a common mistake, but I'm trying to consider the opponent's opportunities more now.

Avatar of stryik

I assume pushing the d-pawn after 5. .. e5 is overextending?

Avatar of atomichicken

I don't think so, maybe I'm wrong.

Avatar of KillaBeez

Sorry mathijs, I just gave a cursory examination of the board without really calculating.

Avatar of mathijs
KillaBeez wrote:

Sorry mathijs, I just gave a cursory examination of the board without really calculating.


 Te absolvo. I do that all the time. I just looked a little closer here because I wanted to make the sac work.

Avatar of WISH_I_WAS_A_GM

And six years later... I played my first perfect game according to computer analysis, with a greek gift in the mist. Actually the one mathjis mentioned on quote 4.

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=840853317