Please, dont underestimate me

Sort:
Monster-Bullet

My opponent has underestimated me. He had given the queen since the beginning of the game. Surprisingly, when beaten on the board, he deliberately stalling the game to avoid defeat by checkmate. He may embarrassed then offline. It was a very funny experience.

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=745167475

Kriptacular

He was just messing around looks like.

Monster-Bullet
Kriptacular wrote:

He was just messing around looks like.

Maybe.

Kriptacular

Well if he gives up his Queen for nothing on move 2 he's obviously not really trying...

-waller-

Why have you named him as GM onesecond? He's not a GM. His name is just "onesecond".

David210

1 min game? thats not real chess.

JMB2010

Yeah, as waller pointed out, he's not a real GM, his avatar is GM.

whoispaulmiller

His avatar is a massive GM in red. He was clearly messing around in that game, but to what end? Odd. 

Monster-Bullet
-waller- wrote:
Why have you named him as GM onesecond? He's not a GM. His name is just "onesecond".

NM JMB2010 wrote:
Yeah, as waller pointed out, he's not a real GM, his avatar is GM.

whoispaulmiller wrote:
His avatar is massive GM in red.  

Excuse me, I'm careless. He didnt a GM. Thanks for your correction

Monster-Bullet
JMB2010 wrote:

Yeah, as waller pointed out, he's not a real GM, his avatar is GM.

Yes, I was wrong and be embarrassed. He's not a real GM (avatar only). By the way, I hope that my opponent on my newer bullet is a real titled player (NM).

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=745574234

Monster-Bullet
orangeishblue wrote:

Video games are fun.

He..Smile

Monster-Bullet
TheGoalkeeper wrote:

onesecond is not a real GM (grandmaster), his avatar is. Check it here: http://www.chess.com/members/view/onesecond

Another thing, onesecond, didn't really play properly in my opinion, he was just messing about. You can tell by giving up his queen like that.

Thanks for your feedback. 

Maybe he was just messing about. By the way, If he dared to sacrifice his queen in vain, this means he must be able to show that he is stronger than me.

In fact, he was unable to finish the game perfectly. He deliberately stalling the game to avoid defeat by checkmate then he ran and offline suddenly after I beat up on the board. Offcourse, It became a big question mark for me. 

However, how to play as it will not produce anything for him, either in online chess or real one. Obviously, Im not as easy as he imagined.

Black_Locust

He made some other pretty big blunders later in the game too -- trading in rooks for knights when he was already down.

Either he was just messing around or somebody who hadn't earned the 2300+ rating was using his account.

If he were going to give away his queen as a handicap, but then play to win, he would have avoided some of those later bad moves.

Monster-Bullet

He had understood that it was a bullet. In bullet, many possibilities that can not be predicted in advance, anything is possible. Thus, he should not sacrifice his queen in vain without a compensation, at least he should get the time advantage.

Once he realized the difficult situation, while the time remaining is still a lot, and then he deliberately made Some other pretty big blunders to give the impression that he was messing around. This is a trick to obscure the meaning of my victory. Hehe.. it's a psychology matter.Smile

Monster-Bullet
LuftWaffles wrote:
Monster-Bullet wrote:
Please, dont underestimate me

Don't worry, we won't.

I didnt ask fellow players respect each other in every way, but its better if we dont underestimate our opponents only based on ratings assessment, especially for the bullet.

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=745710046