Cool game
Game with 100% accuracy
Sort:
SorcererOfRiga wrote:
very nice game!
I analyzed it here:
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/a-heroic-defense-in-the-sicilian-najdorf-kids-dont-try-this-at-home
I think that 100% accuracy is impossible unless you are using the analysis engine chess.com is using.
1jdo I think they are claiming 100% accuracy per analysis of the chess com engine.That engine obviously makes mistakes however.
I just played a game with 100% accuracy too! Was I cheating?
yes
person
haha
my name lee
1jdo wrote:
I think that 100% accuracy is impossible unless you are using the analysis engine chess.com is using.
Or the game lasts 10-15 moves and the opening constitutes 8-10 of them. I’ve had a few 100% games, but none longer than 12 moves, lol.
I've had a few "100% games" before and several of them over 12 moves 
However, these "100%" games were not even my best games. It is easy to get 100% when your opponent blunders early and practically every move is winning for you. Notice that in almost all of these examples, one side blundered early on.
Paunescu64 wrote:
In this game I didn't make any mistakes partially because the game ended very soon.
Sorry, you lost me at 1. f4. 🙄
FrancisCominelli wrote: (Post #10)
I just played a game with 100% accuracy too! Was I cheating?
Lol I wasn't expecting such a short game. It's funny how Qxc8# went unchallenged by any of Black's pieces (since that Black queen was unprotected).
I tried a Komodo engine analysis and on may 2020 and the result was 96% only.
TheThirdMouse wrote:
1.f4 was a mistake
No it’s not 
TheThirdMouse wrote:
1.f4 was a mistake because it enables black to choose from multiple plans that lead to being equal or better for free. It wastes white's entire first move advantage, and commits a move that black can forcibly punish by driving the game into waters where it is a weakness rather than a strength. 3 strikes, it's out.
How is f4 a weakness... does 1...e5 refute it? I don't think so. Black cannot "forcibly punish" anything, although stockfish does claim a -0.2
SNUDOO wrote:
TheThirdMouse wrote:
1.f4 was a mistake
No it’s not
1. f4 is for the bird's. It's not played at high levels for good reason.
In this game I didn't make any mistakes partially because the game ended very soon.