Game with 100% accuracy

Sort:
Avatar of Paunescu64

In this game I didn't make any mistakes partially because the game ended very soon.

Avatar of santabaldwin

Cool game

Avatar of blueemu

This one was 99.4%.

https://www.chess.com/daily/game/200865884

Avatar of blueemu
SorcererOfRiga wrote:

very nice game!

I analyzed it here:

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/a-heroic-defense-in-the-sicilian-najdorf-kids-dont-try-this-at-home

 

Avatar of santabaldwin

I think that 100% accuracy is impossible unless you are using the analysis engine chess.com is using.

Avatar of ponz111

1jdo  I think they are claiming 100% accuracy per analysis of the chess com engine.That engine obviously makes mistakes however.

 

Avatar of FrancisCominelli

I just played a game with 100% accuracy too! Was I cheating?

Avatar of sparklingwawa

yes

 

Avatar of sparklingwawa

person

 

Avatar of sparklingwawa

haha

Avatar of sparklingwawa

my name lee

 

Avatar of BlindThief
1jdo wrote:

I think that 100% accuracy is impossible unless you are using the analysis engine chess.com is using.

Or the game lasts 10-15 moves and the opening constitutes 8-10 of them. I’ve had a few 100% games, but none longer than 12 moves, lol.

Avatar of KeSetoKaiba

I've had a few "100% games" before and several of them over 12 moves wink.png

However, these "100%" games were not even my best games. It is easy to get 100% when your opponent blunders early and practically every move is winning for you. Notice that in almost all of these examples, one side blundered early on.

Avatar of Capabotvikhine
Paunescu64 wrote:

 

 

In this game I didn't make any mistakes partially because the game ended very soon.

 

Sorry, you lost me at 1. f4. 🙄

Avatar of eric0022
FrancisCominelli wrote: (Post #10)

I just played a game with 100% accuracy too! Was I cheating?

 

Lol I wasn't expecting such a short game. It's funny how Qxc8# went unchallenged by any of Black's pieces (since that Black queen was unprotected).

Avatar of LucianoLS

I tried a Komodo engine analysis and on may 2020 and the result was 96% only. 

Avatar of sndeww
TheThirdMouse wrote:

1.f4 was a mistake

No it’s not

Avatar of sndeww
TheThirdMouse wrote:

1.f4 was a mistake because it enables black to choose from multiple plans that lead to being equal or better for free.  It wastes white's entire first move advantage,  and commits a move that black can forcibly punish by driving the game into waters where it is a weakness rather than a strength.  3 strikes,  it's out.  

How is f4 a weakness... does 1...e5 refute it? I don't think so. Black cannot "forcibly punish" anything, although stockfish does claim a -0.2

Avatar of Capabotvikhine
SNUDOO wrote:
TheThirdMouse wrote:

1.f4 was a mistake

No it’s not

1. f4 is for the bird's. It's not played at high levels for good reason.

Avatar of sndeww
Morphys-Revenge wrote:
SNUDOO wrote:
TheThirdMouse wrote:

1.f4 was a mistake

No it’s not

1. f4 is for the bird's. It's not played at high levels for good reason.

GMs play it