sometimes stockfish are broken bruh engines can be broken when were going to with another page to analysis
Game with 100% accuracy
Sort:
Nice!
Apr 11, 2021
0
#44
FrancisCominelli a écrit :
I just played a game with 100% accuracy too! Was I cheating?
lol your friend played against you voluntary like a 100 or less ELO to give an example of 100%.
Nice game
I don't know if 100% is possible. Different runs typically have +-2% deviations
Jul 22, 2021
0
#48
Paunescu64 wrote:
In this game I didn't make any mistakes partially because the game ended very soon.
oh... I will give a reward.
Cool!
Jan 1, 2022
0
#51
cool game
False. https://www.chess.com/game/live/37230103207 I just played a game with 100% accuracy
Paunescu64 wrote:
In this game I didn't make any mistakes partially because the game ended very soon.
That is far from 100% accuracy
B1ZMARK wrote:
TheThirdMouse wrote:
1.f4 was a mistake because it enables black to choose from multiple plans that lead to being equal or better for free. It wastes white's entire first move advantage, and commits a move that black can forcibly punish by driving the game into waters where it is a weakness rather than a strength. 3 strikes, it's out.
How is f4 a weakness... does 1...e5 refute it? I don't think so. Black cannot "forcibly punish" anything, although stockfish does claim a -0.2
You have to realize that white threw away all of his first move advantage and more by playing 1.f4. Not that humans can really hard punish it, but it simply comes down to having less chances and black not having to deal with better moves.
Mar 24, 2022
0
#57
Paunescu64 wrote:
In this game I didn't make any mistakes partially because the game ended very soon.
Spelled Garry Kasparov
No mistakes except for the huge 1. f4 inaccuracy 
It says 96.6 now, but that's a great game!
Wow! Awesome!!!