Congrats. When you took Qxc3, psychologically that probably registered as merely a 'retake'. He didn't see it was also a mating threat. This often happens when an opponent "chases my Q away"--I move it to a very dangerous square, but since I'm "retreating" he doesn't see the danger. You were only down a piece and a pawn (don't know the time control), but if it was bullet, of course you don't resign!
I won against a 1800 hundred player.

Congrats. When you took Qxc3, psychologically that probably registered as merely a 'retake'. He didn't see it was also a mating threat. This often happens when an opponent "chases my Q away"--I move it to a very dangerous square, but since I'm "retreating" he doesn't see the danger. You were only down a piece and a pawn (don't know the time control), but if it was bullet, of course you don't resign!
It was a 10+0 game
now that you said I remember that once IM Eric Rosen also lost to 900 rated player cuz he didn't saw the threat.
Congrats. When you took Qxc3, psychologically that probably registered as merely a 'retake'. He didn't see it was also a mating threat. This often happens when an opponent "chases my Q away"--I move it to a very dangerous square, but since I'm "retreating" he doesn't see the danger. You were only down a piece and a pawn (don't know the time control), but if it was bullet, of course you don't resign!
You nailed the point. If a move is made without captures, it usually has a motive. But when a capture is made, you may think that the intent of the move is to capture that piece only (and nothing further).

Means you won against a 180 000 rated player? Wow.
lmao

Means you won against a 180 000 rated player? Wow.
Is that even possible?

Means you won against a 180 000 rated player? Wow.
Is that even possible?

If you used another website, it was probably lichess. And I heard 1500s on chess com saying they were 1900 on lichess. So this theoretically would about 1400 on chess com

If you used another website, it was probably lichess. And I heard 1500s on chess com saying they were 1900 on lichess. So this theoretically would about 1400 on chess com
Yep you are right I guess,I am 1350 there.

If you used another website, it was probably lichess. And I heard 1500s on chess com saying they were 1900 on lichess. So this theoretically would about 1400 on chess com
Yep you are right I guess,I am 1350 there.
Well the last game you played against me today you definitely play like a 1600 here.
At lichess they are not that weak!
I did beat a 1834 here that played like a 1600 and a 1540 two days ago that played like a 1750 and he destroyed me.
Hello everyone,this is the game I played against a 1800 rated player on other site(sorry chess.com)