I won against a 1800 hundred player.

bisht_bisht_bisht

Hello everyone,this is the game I played against a 1800 rated player on other site(sorry chess.com)

GMatchen

Congrats. When you took Qxc3, psychologically that probably registered as merely a 'retake'. He didn't see it was also a mating threat. This often happens when an opponent "chases my Q away"--I move it to a very dangerous square, but since I'm "retreating" he doesn't see the danger.  You were only down a piece and a pawn (don't know the time control), but if it was bullet, of course you don't resign!

bisht_bisht_bisht
GMatchen wrote:

Congrats. When you took Qxc3, psychologically that probably registered as merely a 'retake'. He didn't see it was also a mating threat. This often happens when an opponent "chases my Q away"--I move it to a very dangerous square, but since I'm "retreating" he doesn't see the danger.  You were only down a piece and a pawn (don't know the time control), but if it was bullet, of course you don't resign!

 

It was a 10+0 game

now that you said I remember that once IM Eric Rosen also lost to 900 rated player cuz he didn't saw the threat.

Aepf

White is actually quite good in between, but the "last mistake" loses! Greeting Christian

eric0022

I won against a 1800 hundred player.

 

 

Means you won against a 180 000 rated player? Wow.

eric0022
GMatchen wrote:

Congrats. When you took Qxc3, psychologically that probably registered as merely a 'retake'. He didn't see it was also a mating threat. This often happens when an opponent "chases my Q away"--I move it to a very dangerous square, but since I'm "retreating" he doesn't see the danger.  You were only down a piece and a pawn (don't know the time control), but if it was bullet, of course you don't resign!

 

You nailed the point. If a move is made without captures, it usually has a motive. But when a capture is made, you may think that the intent of the move is to capture that piece only (and nothing further).

bisht_bisht_bisht
eric0022 wrote:
I won against a 1800 hundred player.

 

 

Means you won against a 180 000 rated player? Wow.

lmao

Marie-AnneLiz

You played very well! Congrats!

Srimurugan108

Congratulations 

UppityEelChesskid
eric0022 wrote:
I won against a 1800 hundred player.

 

 

Means you won against a 180 000 rated player? Wow.

Is that even possible?

bisht_bisht_bisht
Marie-AnneLiz wrote:

You played very well! Congrats!

thank you very much

Zayan42
UppityEelChesskid wrote:
eric0022 wrote:
I won against a 1800 hundred player.

 

 

Means you won against a 180 000 rated player? Wow.

Is that even possible?

 

Zayan42

If you used another website, it was probably lichess. And I heard 1500s on chess com saying they were 1900 on lichess. So this theoretically would about 1400 on chess com

bisht_bisht_bisht
Zayan42 wrote:

If you used another website, it was probably lichess. And I heard 1500s on chess com saying they were 1900 on lichess. So this theoretically would about 1400 on chess com

Yep you are right I guess,I am 1350 there.

Marie-AnneLiz
bisht_bisht_bisht a écrit :
Zayan42 wrote:

If you used another website, it was probably lichess. And I heard 1500s on chess com saying they were 1900 on lichess. So this theoretically would about 1400 on chess com

Yep you are right I guess,I am 1350 there.

Well the last game you played against me today you definitely play like a 1600  here.

At lichess they are not that weak!

I did beat a 1834 here that played like a 1600 and a 1540 two days ago that played like a 1750 and he destroyed me.

EnergeticHay

Nice game! happy.png

bisht_bisht_bisht
EnergeticHay wrote:

Nice game!

Thanks sir happy.png

Lenudan

Good game, but if that guy was 1800 then he was either drunk, stoned or perhaps a little of both
!

bisht_bisht_bisht
Lenudan wrote:

Good game, but if that guy was 1800 then he was either drunk, stoned or perhaps a little of both
!

I guess he was playing blindfolded and didn't saw mate in one wink.png Thanks!!

Terminator-T800

The player must have been off his nut if you ask me.