I don't want to offend you but are you kidding me?
These are not good moves so when you are a beginner please read good articles for beginners. I learn alot from the articles of Dozy.
Inviting all noobs!
Sort:
Oct 13, 2009
0
#2
Oh my . . . Try playing that way against anybody rated over 300 and you'll get massacred.
after eleven moves,you still have three men in the barn. you have a rook out in left field. and your game is about to go south.
wow...dude, can I have your autograph?
joke?
Oct 16, 2009
0
#7
Wouw... A strategical masterpiece. Your play reminds me of Karpov's quiet, positional style that has quite a sting to it. Please keep me in the loop about your games.
the game lookes untouched!
:o wow some better advice would be this
there are way to many ways to capture one or the other..that's like obvious blunder everywhere well...I don't know who would win at the end but sure it looks pretty for both sides
Oct 16, 2009
0
#11
First game is a beginners moves and would be unwise to play against more experienced players. Because you have to control the center and get ur pieces out if u want any chance to have a good game. Second game is a much better example. But it's a nice thing u tried to do in offering advice.
Ian_Sinclair wrote:
First game is a beginners moves and would be unwise to play against more experienced players. Because you have to control the center and get ur pieces out if u want any chance to have a good game. Second game is a much better example.
by 2nd game you mean my example right; if so then
that first game would defeat deepblue
Oct 16, 2009
0
#14
The first game i am talking about is the one that was first posted by the original forum writer. Just so u know.
yes i know im just asking if your refering the 2nd game to
Oct 16, 2009
0
#17
C'mon guys, this is clearly a joke... just step through the moves:
1. No central control; Knight on the edge
2. Defends the pawn? Gains a bit of center?; takes the center (compared to the rest: !!)
3. Ignores enemies location, puts rook in direct attack of lower piece (bishop); takes queen out too early
4. Handing the enemy a pawn for free; Moving the same piece twice in the beginning, before developing a piece, and weaking the strength of the center.
5. Gaining the center, but instantly losing control due to en passant; Developing a piece (!!)
6. Threatening an easily avoidable fork, that's not even legitimate due to the silly night on the edge; I guess avoiding the fork in the worst possible way (removing the ability to castle)
7. Threatening to win a pawn; Sacrificing a queen for absolutely no benefit.
8. No taking the queen for no reason at all; Putting the queen under attack by two pawns and a rook... again, no benefit at all.
9. C'mon, are you kidding me? Putting the queen under attack by the pawn and the opposing queen.; Trading queens
10. Proof that he knows how to capture with a pawn (thus proving this MUST be a joke); Attacking the rook. Again, not developing any of his pieces;
11. Defending the rook by placing it under fire from the other knight? (Haha, god this post is hilarious); C'mon, are you serious????
rofl noob
!!
I'm sure that most of you are new to chess .com. I myself is a "noob". i'd like to share some basic opening moves that can give you an edge later on in
the game.