?
LOWEST ACCURACY GAME on chess.com!
Sort:
Sep 19, 2020
0
#123
GrandMasterNoob21 wrote:
SNUDOO wrote:
rishabh11great wrote:
SNUDOO wrote:
rishabh11great wrote:
Man once and many times with me this happened.
Why do I always premove e6??
Premove 1...Nf6! it works against everything.
lol I dont like Kings Indian and Alekhine, I just realized that I need to prepare closed openings a lot as people outside India prefer them much more, in India mostly play open lines, but Australia or US or any other non asian country, they prefer closed lines and so I have to prepare
boi what you talking about, I'm asian too
I play closed lines because they're weird!
You can't just say that about other countries without any proof. Just because 10 does it doesn't mean the entire country.
I don't believe that X countries usually plays X type of chess
Sep 19, 2020
0
#125
x is a variable... and by what type of chess I mean stuff like theoretical, closed, etc...
I once played my friend his was like 0.8 or something
oooof 0.7 aqccuracy with only one mistake, 0 inaccuracies, 0 blunders?????/ CAPS is broken
solflores927 a écrit :
rishabh11great wrote:
Man once and many times with me this happened.
Why do I always premove e6??
I think what sometimes happens to me is even worse lol:
Bh6 is not double exclam its just a trick to punish people that premove. !! means brilliant move. This move is tricky/smart but it deserves??
destroyer8470 a écrit :
i DONT UNDERSTAND how black has only 99.7 he's played two best moves and thats it
solflores927 a écrit :
chamo2074 wrote:
solflores927 a écrit :
rishabh11great wrote:
Man once and many times with me this happened.
Why do I always premove e6??
I think what sometimes happens to me is even worse lol:
Bh6 is not double exclam its just a trick to punish people that premove. !! means brilliant move. This move is tricky/smart but it deserves??
i know that, i was just making a joke
Oh ok sarcasm at its best
Sep 20, 2020
0
#133
im_practical wrote:
56 blunders, 27 missed wins here:
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/5471478709?tab=analysis
"sorry, you cannot analyze a game that has no moves"
SNUDOO a écrit :
im_practical wrote:
56 blunders, 27 missed wins here:
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/daily/5471478709?tab=analysis
"sorry, you cannot analyze a game that has no moves"
same
YES THE ABOVE ONE
Sep 24, 2020
0
#137
will2009 a écrit :
OMG GUYS I GOT 100 PERCENT ACCURACY!!!!!!!! https://www.chess.com/a/mphSsoUn11Y
Nice game, really
@rishabh11great