Masterclass of Smith-Morra Gambit


8. Bxc3 f6 9. e5 a6 10. Nh4 fxe5 11. Qh5+ g6 12. Nxg6 Nf6 13. Qh3 Rg8 14. Nxe5
Ne4 15. Qh5+ Ke7 16. Bb4+ d6 17. Qf7# 1-0

What does white has to show for a couple of pawns?
Black will park the knight at the excellent c5 square, where it cannot be attacked by pawns, and develop like ...b6, ...Bb7 etc. with a virtually winning position. The "double pawn Morra gambit" is just crap.

What does white has to show for a couple of pawns?
Black will park the knight at the excellent c5 square, where it cannot be attacked by pawns, and develop like ...b6, ...Bb7 etc. with a virtually winning position. The "double pawn Morra gambit" is just crap.
What a great square indeed, c5.


The Morra can not be played as a Danish. Black's e pawn stops any such ideas. Naturally 4. Nc3 is required and is equal.

Masters do not play the Morra. Why? Not because of 3 ... dxc3 but 3. ... Nf6 gives Black the best winning chances. Hence, Masters avoid walking into the Alapin as White. It is the lower rated players who believe the myth of accepting the pawn refutes the Gambit, much to the delight of Morra players.

It's wrong from first principles if black can sacrifice a piece for a pawn and get a better ending, so white would probably have to chop the knight on a6 to prevent black from being able to achieve that kind of ending. Then white would probably have to castle k-side AND advance the k-side pawns against black's king, which black can leave on e8 in any case. I'd rather be black, for sure.
7.Bxa6 is a no-go because of 7...Qa5+ and ...Qxa6, and now white even has trouble castling without allowing a queen swap.

#18 I said that (#14) but ghosty was busy singing lou reed, rolling stones and who knows what else all over the thread.