KeSetoKaiba wrote:
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:
Ratings here are not Elo, they are Glicko.
No, chess.com is actually a form of glicko ratings (glicko 2.0 last I checked).
Glicko...Glicko 2.0 is still Glicko.
My bad elo
Sort:
Sep 22, 2025
0
#43
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:
KeSetoKaiba wrote:
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:
Ratings here are not Elo, they are Glicko.
No, chess.com is actually a form of glicko ratings (glicko 2.0 last I checked).
Glicko...Glicko 2.0 is still Glicko.
Oh, I misread this. I thought you said the ratings here were elo.
Sep 22, 2025
0
#44
KeSetoKaiba wrote:
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:
KeSetoKaiba wrote:
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:
Ratings here are not Elo, they are Glicko.
No, chess.com is actually a form of glicko ratings (glicko 2.0 last I checked).
Glicko...Glicko 2.0 is still Glicko.
Oh, I misread this. I thought you said the ratings here were elo.
Close enough 
2300
20 days ago
0
#53
On chess.com, I’m a 850. But on chesskid.com I’m a 1250!?! Can anyone explain this?
My 210
Sn1ckl3 wrote:
I know a man. He is 18 years old. He is rated 500. He's played 200 games of rapid. Don't feel bad about yourself; there's always someone worse.
That person would be me.
7 hrs ago
0
#58
Puzzles: 2001
Rapid: 2011
Blitz: 1527
Bullet: 1210
Daily: 1154
Live 960: 1420
4 hrs ago
0
#59
FitzroyAveryVacker12 wrote:
On chess.com, I’m a 850. But on chesskid.com I’m a 1250!?! Can anyone explain this?
Inflation.
Ratings here are not Elo, they are Glicko.
No, chess.com is actually a form of glicko ratings (glicko 2.0 last I checked).