My game against IM Igor Zugic

Sort:
Rael

Yesterday myself and fellow chess.com member TheGrobe both participated in a simultaneous exhibition for charity put on by the Calgary Chess Club featuring the 2006 Canadian Chess Champion IM Igor Zugic, whose current rating I was told is 2553. I've posted pictures of the event here.

Anyways, I'd like to recieve some feedback about the game Igor and I had, and I'm sure TheGrobe will post his game in this thread at somepoint also.

I've never played an IM before and I was fully expecting to be obliterated by flashy tactics, which wasn't the case. When I finally resigned, I was just a knight down, I think he was playing very slowly and conservatively - it got me thinking about how people playing simuls might quickly size up and categorize their opponents around the table; I was probably one of the weakest players in attendence and so he was likely conserving his real thinking for much better players and playing very slowly but surely with me or something.

I am pleased that I got to put him in check once, and that I got to "threaten" a back-rank mate and force him to create a flight square. Empty, ultimately, but you take what you can get against a player of his calibre, right?

Here's the game;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So what do you guys think? All in all, pretty dull, right? Any ideas though?

 


ericmittens
Is 5. b3 theory?
erik
nice :) thanks for sharing that!
Rael
ericmittens wrote: Is 5. b3 theory?

Porbably not, Eric. What would you have played there do you think?


ericmittens

Well to be honest I don't really like 3.e3 either Tongue out

 But maybe just something simple like 5.Nf3...I'm not sure what theory recommends. 


Rael
Ah yeah, you're probably right. It was my understanding that e3 is good in the Queen's Gamit if they choose to accept the offered pawn as an easy way to regain the pawn with development or something. I just played a structure that I felt comfortable with instead of what the situation might have demanded... I guess what you're saying is there is little adivce you can really give be because my screw-ups occurred so early on as that it was a lost game off the bat in a sense?
ericmittens
I don't play the queen's gambit so I can't give you any concrete advice concerning variations, but it seemed that b3 weakened your queenside darksquares a bit too much. That was one nasty pin on c3.
ArkinLocke
You played pretty well against him, a lot better than I would've lol. Did anyone beat him?
megalodon3
Very interesting game, I hope that I can learn to play like that someday too. (The IM, not Rael, though getting to Rael's level would be nice too) I enjoyed the pictures too.
ericmittens
Oh, and I think e3 is only good in the queen's gambit when white has already placed his dark squared bishop on g5 or f4.
Rael

 

@Locke86: 

No to my knowledge, again, I had to get back to work... I would've really liked to have stayed and played it out just to see how long I could last. Before the match TheGrobe and I were like, let's see which of us can hold out longer. He got pretty brutalized, I remember looking over at his board and seeing tons of captured material. He says he'll post his game later so that'll be cool to see.

There were some other players in attendance associated with the Calgary Chess Club that were experts, for sure. I liked seeing how long Igor would pause at respective games, and of course, always got a thrill whenever he'd think for just that much longer on a given move in our game.

It was lot's off fun, taking time in the middle of the day of work to play in a simul, haha. Oh, and this has nothing to do with anything but they also handed out chess-keychains, which I think is pretty swanky. Should've got a picture of that too. It's shiny.


seraphim407

Well played, Rael, well played!

However -- though I'm no judge -- 5. b3 may have been a mistake. It allowed Igor to easily cruise in for that nasty knight pin of his.


Absurd
Rael, about opening theory, that wasn't initially the Queen's Gambit at all, but rather the Benoni Defense. Book there is, counterintuitive though it may seem, 3.d5.
TheGrobe

Here is my game -- it's a sad sight to behold.  I really wish I'd played better.  I blundered on move 10 and he pounced with a nice combo to fork my queen and rook.  I really messed up on 15 though, where I thought I'd picked up a pawn, but in reality had hung my knight.  I was ready to resign there, but Rael encouraged me to play on -- everything after that is desperation, and sloppy careless play to boot.

 


TheGrobe

Rael, you mentioned small victories -- I really made Igor think after 10. Nde2.  He paused at my board for 20-30 seconds.  I remember thinking, "yes, I've got him thinking -- that has to count for something".  After the bishops came off the board (opening the f-file for my rook as planned) he shocked me back to reality with 11... Ng4.  It was only then that I realized why he'd paused at my board after I offered the bishop exchange.

My "small victory" was short lived indeed.


Mygame5377
U tryed and that is all that matter's
TheGrobe
I wouldn't have missed it -- it's a rare opportunity, I just wish I'd brought my 'A' game.
Evil_Homer
Not being funny or anything, but I don't think your "A" game would have been up to it either.
TheGrobe
Aw, I could've taken him.
Evil_Homer
You know, I think that's a great statement, for surely that is the reason we all persevere at this great game.