He blundered a N in the opening and you didn't take it
my immortal game
Sort:
I am pretty sure I played perfectly but maybe not, where did he blunder?
move 9 you hung a bishop. move 18 you hung another bishop. move 22 trades a rook for 2 minors when there was a hanging rook.
and assuming the ratings are real, which they probably aren't, congratz on beating someone 700 points lower than you!
I checked your profile. 1 finished game, which does not match this game. So this means that you lied and that the game was a hoax
infinitebrainpower wrote:
I am pretty sure I played perfectly but maybe not, where did he blunder?
lolol
This game was played against a friend in real life, not online, LOL.
oh and move 5 exd6???
f3 traps the knight
infinitebrainpower wrote:
This game was played against a friend in real life, not online, LOL.
yep, totally a 2200 making careless blunders starting from move 5 all the way to the end of the game. and calling your friend a patzer is really nice lol
He calls himself a patzer and is really cool about it, he has fun with it.
why don't you answer my question: are you really 2200?
he probably inflated his rating; either that or he deflated it just to feel better.
his rating is 1258 in bullet. Definitely not 2200.
Let us look at chasm1995's amazing ability to analyze statistics. Check how many bullet games I've played. I'll wait.
infinitebrainpower wrote:
Let us look at chasm1995's amazing ability to analyze statistics. Check how many bullet games I've played. I'll wait.
his best win is 200 points over your best win. his average opponent rating is also 200 points higher than yours. and if your rating in bullet is based on playing 1 game and beating a 700, I suppose it won't be very accurate.
and you still haven't answered my question. why are you lying and showing off your games? and are you really 2200? because I doubt it
There's that one game against somebody in the 700 range. Not a judge of how well you play. Instead, let's take the game you did show us, and point out how it's flawed. You also can't call a game of yours an immortal. You would need to be a master level chess player and play a game against your equal or your better flawless from both sides, but with you somehow gaining a slight edge and winning. That's far from an immortal.
chasm1995 wrote:
There's that one game against somebody in the 700 range. Not a judge of how well you play. Instead, let's take the game you did show us, and point out how it's flawed. You also can't call a game of yours an immortal. You would need to be a master level chess player and play a game against your equal or your better flawless from both sides, but with you somehow gaining a slight edge and winning. That's far from an immortal.
it'll go down in chess.com history as an immortal lie :)
Immortal is an exagerration, but at least it's a good game.
Could I have the link to the original game?
look at this azaming game!