"The endgame was a demonstration of impeccable, grandmaster-level technique," -- Paul Morphy (1859)
(my) Sicilian Defense in a nutshell (i was white)

"The endgame was a demonstration of impeccable, grandmaster-level technique," -- Paul Morphy (1859)
I disagree, it was a demonstration of impeccable, computer level technique

b1z gonna win the candidates and beat magnus next year with that endgame technique
Absolutely, Magnus couldn't win that endgame against his average opponent, even in classical.

why not 7.Nd5?
I feel like that line is significantly easier to play than the main line personally
I think that it's easier to play for both sides tho..
it has just overall less tactical stuff

why not 7.Nd5?
I feel like that line is significantly easier to play than the main line personally
Because you play it

why not 7.Nd5?
I feel like that line is significantly easier to play than the main line personally
Because you play it
i used to play bg5 and my score was like 30% in 40 games
I think my score is fine
plus I like the pawn structure better

De momenta ur opponent played 2...Nc6 (instead of the vastly superior d6) he decided upon his own doom. "oooooooo I am gonna play nc6 and i am gonna lose" --- this is what ur opp thought while playing 1...c5
Also your opponent : "I am not gonna play Najdorf var even though I will play a6 in 2-3 moves anyway, because i wanna lose , i am doo doo"

De momenta ur opponent played 2...Nc6 (instead of the vastly superior d6) he decided upon his own doom. "oooooooo I am gonna play nc6 and i am gonna lose" --- this is what ur opp thought while playing 1...c5
Also your opponent : "I am not gonna play Najdorf var even though I will play a6 in 2-3 moves anyway, because i wanna lose , i am doo doo"
Bruh..
This what he played is a legit theory.

Bruh..
This what he played is a legit theory.
Here , I have , in my comment, elucidated, my preference for Najdorf var with a little bit of humour (of my taste).
I totally agree with your statement "Bruh, it is legit theory".
Which Sicilian do you prefer, although I feel you are not a sicilian player, don't tell me you play the inferior "1 ... e5"

Bruh..
This what he played is a legit theory.
Here , I have , in my comment, elucidated, my preference for Najdorf var with a little bit of humour (of my taste).
I totally agree with your statement "Bruh, it is legit theory".
Which Sicilian do you prefer, although I feel you are not a sicilian player, don't tell me you play the inferior "1 ... e5"
I play 1.e5 Nc6 or 1. d4 Nf6
I like horses...

I play 1.e5 Nc6 or 1. d4 Nf6
I like horses...
Haaaa!! as I suspected you play the inferior e5, seems like you try to go for a draw while playing black, or like to follow in white's steps
White: "I will attack your pawn"
Black (e5 player) : "ok, I will protect it the, now attack something else, so that i can protect and be passive for eternity, as I have no fighting spirit"

I play 1.e5 Nc6 or 1. d4 Nf6
I like horses...
Haaaa!! as I suspected you play the inferior e5, seems like you try to go for a draw while playing black, or like to follow in white's steps
White: "I will attack your pawn"
Black (e5 player) : "ok, I will protect it the, now attack something else, so that i can protect and be passive for eternity, as I have no fighting spirit"
huh.. Sorry i did mean 1.e4 Nc6 or 1. d4 Nf6 ... my bad I guess..
I don't play e5.
If you asked me what I play as white then I play 1.b3 last many years
Just look at some my games...
> Plays 14 moves of theory
> gets out of theory
> immediately makes a mistake because honestly I have no clue how to play the sveshnikov ??? I think you just make forward moves and hope something happens ???