premature resignation

Sort:
Avatar of quixote88pianist

Has anyone noticed that you can gain many, perhaps hundreds, of free rating points just by playing games on chess.com? (As in, I'm sure everyone has!) I often play people who resign at the slightest sign of trouble. Take this game:

I played a short game that I didn't deserve to win (at least not yet), because Black could have easily held on. Mental toughness goes a long way, but I never realized that it could virtually steal dozens or hundreds of points from players so easily.
Avatar of belgium2

1: Do not post the names of other players on the forums. It is against chess.com rules. Now the other player has to be humiliated. 2: Your resignation is most likely from a begginer who has played easy opponents.  

Avatar of quixote88pianist

Check again. I changed my opponent's name to "Anonymous." My opponent has not been humiliated.

Avatar of belgium2

Good! I didn't want to be mean or anything, but rules are rules.

Avatar of rooperi
belgium2 wrote:

Good! I didn't want to be mean or anything, but rules are rules.


Is that really a rule?

It's quite possible for a 1400 to consider himself lost in that position. He needs a !! move to escape, maybe he just couldn't find it.....

Avatar of kco
belgium2 wrote:

1: Do not post the names of other players on the forums. It is against chess.com rules. Now the other player has to be humiliated. 2: Your resignation is most likely from a begginer who has played easy opponents.  


 that only apply to who someone feel that they are being abusive.

Avatar of trysts
tonydal wrote:

Yeah jeez, what a dumb wienie rule (not to mention that this whole "humiliation" business is rather debatable).  Btw I also don't see what's wrong with 19... Rxf4.


I believe i would be humiliated, if someone posted my name on their game. But I would never want it as a rule not to post it. I'm quite for the minimalist point of view on rules and laws.

Avatar of quixote88pianist
tonydal wrote:

Yeah jeez, what a dumb wienie rule (not to mention that this whole "humiliation" business is rather debatable).  Btw I also don't see what's wrong with 19... Rxf4.


According to my analysis program, 19. ... Rxf4 is also a fine option, but I guess it thought the continuation above was just a little bit better.

If the shoe were on the other foot, I, too, would probably feel a bit humiliated... although I'd hope I wouldn't be, because I'm specifically disciplining myself not to abhor losses.

Also, is it okay to post someone's name on a game if they won the game? No humiliation then.