Proof that hypermodern openings are rubbish


There's an important difference between hypermodern play and plain bad play. Rg1 isn't hypermodern, it's a bad move.

Dear Talfan, the game you illustrated has some element of "Hypermodernism" in the early stages. But then White carried it too far in the later stages. He blundered his way around and lost. But what is "HYPERMODERN " chess? The
"father" of hypermodern chess is Aaron Nimzowich! He advocated a different way of looking at "Centre-control" of the board. Whereas Siegbert Tarrash and his followers said that the centre must be controlled by the use of pawns, Nimzowich turned this premise "upside-down". He said ,"my way is to use pieces Not pawns to control the centre." He proved this in his games against Tarrasch and all the great masters of that time! Later Alekhine and others assimilated Nimzowich's principles and used it with some modifications. The Alekhine's Defence is a very good example of Hypermodernism! "CENTRE-CONTROL" is what the Openings are all about!

and you sir managed to get this one locked which isn't wortrhwhile to bring up again.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/stop-playin-gararbe-openings?lc=1#last_comment

I think maybe that's a moderation problem, not Starmute's kco.
why the moderation problem ?

Hard to say. Was Starmute's assessment of 1. f3 as garbage really a thread lockable offense? I certainly don't see it that way, and neither is resurrecting this or any other thread.
Don't try this at home