Nice Mate coming soon !
The Winning Game
Sort:
Original Link:
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=613172609
I think 14...Qb4+ saves the day for Black.
SupremeOverlord wrote:
Looks like a boring standard mate to me
It looks like a boring standard mate too. 
See your archieve at : http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=608842989
TitanCG wrote:
I think 14...Qb4+ saves the day for Black.
14. .... Qb4+
15. c3 g6
16.Nf6+ Kh8
17.Qh7# (still mate) !
SupremeOverlord wrote:
Not insulting you, it's just that your previous comment promised a nice mate. I was extremely dissapointed.
When I play lightning (1 min), I say this game as a good checkmate, because I am observant and able to use a golden opportunity in the midst of limited time. Are you able to do the same thing, if you play in the 1 minute?
SupremeOverlord wrote:
Calm your tits.
You wrote "Nice Mate coming soon !" and then posted a game with a normal mate on h7. That's all I was saying. There's no need to look through my game archive for the most recent miniature and call me a cheater, and then thump your chest and try to say you're better than me. Learn to take (extremely tiny) criticism better, you egocentric douchebag.
Yes, I just talked factual issues. I'm egocentric because I did something for myself.
Oct 1, 2013
0
#49
Well, posting about one million games is a little troubling as far as deducing the state of your humility.
chessman1504 wrote:
Well, posting about one million games is a little troubling as far as deducing the state of your humility.
I just gave myself an award for the achievement of which I get with difficulty. By the way, you can still humble, even though you have shown confidence ! 
My opponent has made a wrong move so that the opportunity to play the draw has turned into checkmate.
Original Link:
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=613402262
Oct 2, 2013
0
#54
jadarite wrote:
RONALD_A wrote:
chessman1504 wrote:
Well, posting about one million games is a little troubling as far as deducing the state of your humility.
I just gave myself an award for the achievement of which I get with difficulty. By the way, you can still humble, even though you have shown confidence !
You are confidently posting. Now, confidently start a tournament allowing 2000+ to join.
The only way to shut your ego up is to crush it with a thing called "reality". Boasting and bragging about beating people at your level has the same impact as saying you cross the street faster than people the same age as you.
Who cares? I don't think I will be reading about you soon on chessbase.com Instead, these fellows and ladies are being talked about: Tomashevsky-Grischuk, Nakamura, D'Costa/Murphy, Humpy, Gelfand and Ivanchuk, Garry Kasparov, Dronavalli Harika, Zhao Xue, Caruana, Karsten Müller, and Gata Kamsky
So, Ronald, if you really want some attention here is what you should do. Go to a McDonald's and sit next to one of those Ronald Mcdonald statues sitting on a bench. Then, when passers by say, "Look it's Ronald" you can pretend they are actually talking about you.
After which, you can turn your laptop around and amaze them with all the fast games you won. They might even buy you a coffee.
Haha, so I'm not the only one who thought it was troubling I see.
jadarite wrote:
You are confidently posting. Now, confidently start a tournament allowing 2000+ to join. and bla...bla..bla..
I just talked to my level. I am more productive among players who have a rating of 1200 to 1600. It's simply and nothing more than that. If you are able to do similar to what I do, please show it to us.
Original Link:
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=613734558
If I had the time, I would copy all the games that you lost and make another thread.
AlxMaster wrote:
If I had the time, I would copy all the games that you lost and make another thread.
On this occasion, I have published one of the defeat of your game. Please checkout the following simulations:
Link: http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=608091867
Note:
Your defeat is a tragic event, given the data:
1. You have been defeated by an opponent who has a lower rating
2. You were defeated in a standard game of chess (30 minutes). In fact, the length of control time doesn't help you to play accurately. What a shame !
RONALD_A wrote:
AlxMaster wrote:
If I had the time, I would copy all the games that you lost and make another thread.
On this occasion, I have published one of the defeat of your game. Please checkout the following simulations:
Link: http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=608091867
Note:
Your defeat is a tragic event, given the data:
1. You have been defeated by an opponent who has a lower rating
2. You were defeated in a standard game of chess (30 minutes). In fact, the length of control time doesn't help you to play accurately. What a shame !
On this occasion, I have also published one of the defeat of your game, Ronald. Please checkout the following simulations:
Link: http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=613504127
Note:
Your defeat is a tragic event, given the data:
1. You have been defeated by an opponent who has a lower rating
2. You lost because you abandoned the game. You didn't play a single move, and just let your opponent win. What a shame !
macer75 wrote:
RONALD_A wrote:
AlxMaster wrote:
If I had the time, I would copy all the games that you lost and make another thread.
On this occasion, I have published one of the defeat of your game. Please checkout the following simulations:
Link: http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=608091867
Note:
Your defeat is a tragic event, given the data:
1. You have been defeated by an opponent who has a lower rating
2. You were defeated in a standard game of chess (30 minutes). In fact, the length of control time doesn't help you to play accurately. What a shame !
On this occasion, I have also published one of the defeat of your game, Ronald. Please checkout the following simulations:
Link: http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=613504127
Note:
Your defeat is a tragic event, given the data:
1. You have been defeated by an opponent who has a lower rating
2. You lost because you abandoned the game. You didn't play a single move, and just let your opponent win. What a shame !
It's a shame Ronald, you don't even know how to abort a game.
........................................................................................................................However, the faster games don't really say much about your ability or lack of ability a losing opponent may have. How do we know they had all their attention on the game? Perhaps, they were just waiting and signed onto chess.com to pass the time. They get a phone call or something comes up and they disconnect. You think you won the game because of your chess skills?
Yes, I think I won the games because my chess skill. It's very clear. No one is doing it for me, other than my self. For the record, not all the players who has the same rating like me are also able to produce checkmate as much as I do, especially on game lightning or bullet.