This game had only book moves, best moves, excellent moves, and good moves
Sort:
Togishere
Apr 5, 2019
0
#1
Nice.
Apr 6, 2019
0
#4
Black had plenty of poor moves. So, you must be referring only to your side of things.
Apr 15, 2019
0
#5
Yeah, well, it might not be completely accurate because it is on the new analysis.
Apr 19, 2019
0
#6
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
Uh-oh, another one of these guys who only analyzes his side...
Well, it's kinda hard to get a completely perfect game at 1400 rating... I'm just happy that I played completely perfect.
Apr 20, 2019
0
#9
"This game had only book moves, best moves, excellent moves, and good moves."
And yet, you're not a NM, IM, or GM.
Or a CM, FM, WGM, WCM,WIM...
i didn't understand 50% of the moves, that must be why everything is perfect
Apr 21, 2019
0
#13
It’s easy to find good moves when your opponent gives them to you so freely.
Apr 21, 2019
0
#14
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
Galaxy_Chess_God wrote:
what egregious error mean?
It means you need a dictionary.
I don't have one
Apr 21, 2019
0
#15
Galaxy_Chess_God wrote:
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
Galaxy_Chess_God wrote:
what egregious error mean?
It means you need a dictionary.
I don't have one
Looks like ghost_of_pushwood just got outplayed...
Apr 21, 2019
0
#16
Togishere escribió:
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
Uh-oh, another one of these guys who only analyzes his side...
Well, it's kinda hard to get a completely perfect game at 1400 rating... I'm just happy that I played completely perfect.
That's not completely perfect but it is very precise.
May 4, 2019
0
#17
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
Togishere escribió:
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
Uh-oh, another one of these guys who only analyzes his side...
Well, it's kinda hard to get a completely perfect game at 1400 rating... I'm just happy that I played completely perfect.
That's not completely perfect but it is very precise.
yea
