two bishops for a rook and a pawn, and a scary rook sacrifice
Sort:
Good game! You were right with that pin though; instead on 31. dxe5?? white should have gone for Rd1-d2 winning material.
May 19, 2008
0
#3
haha, i like your sense of humor,
by the way, we need to play the final to Tanner's knockout tourney, you need to challenge me
May 19, 2008
0
#4
Very nice game! :) Actually I was surprised that white did not play 25 Nxc4 forking the queen and rook. :)
einstein, i was wondering the same thing. did you ask your opponent cuz it sure looked like he was setting up for that
nvm.
in this game, i think i got an advantage in the middle game, but i thought i blew it when white's knights got past my pawns, but when my opponent traded their two strong knights for an inactive rook, and then opened lines for my bishops, i came away with the win, after sacrificing a rook for an attack with two bishops on an undefended king.