Ugly mate

Sort:
Avatar of LAexpress12

Avatar of IOliveira

There is a famous former football (soccer) player who says: "there are no ugly goals, ugly is to not score".

I guess it is like that in chess too. 

Avatar of mrkint

25. Ne6+ wins the black queen.

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet

What's so ugly about it?

Avatar of hatman621

i know right? not very ugly at all, and btw, have  you  been playing left hand vs right hand chess l8ly? Cos a lot of mistakes happen this way-i have tried it!

Avatar of LAexpress12
mrkint wrote:

25. Ne6+ wins the black queen.


I know i totally cant believe i missed that

Avatar of LAexpress12
RealityMate wrote:

There were a number of mistakes in the game, but overall it was pretty well attacked by white.  The only thing I really object to is the proportion of exclamation marks to question marks.  Marshall's 23... Qg3!!  is deserving of a double exclamation mark.  Apparently in the same category is the logical 4. e4!!  and the capture of an unprotected pawn with the correct knight 23. Nexg5!!.  Basically what I'm saying is, although the game was good, be more quick to think about what you can improve on in your play rather than how many exclamation marks you can put on your moves.


I like exclamation marks

Avatar of LAexpress12
woodshover wrote:

What's so ugly about it?


i dont like that pawn there, it makes me think i could have done something to mate quicker with it, which i obviously couldnt have, but...

Avatar of TheDestructivePawn

That game is the most weirdest game I ever seen.

Avatar of whisperwalk

Okay, as I looked, I wasn't particularly impressed with 19. g4!, and so I checked with an engine. It turns out to be actually 19.g4?!, giving up a pawn just to develop Black's rook. So I get it - you want to play like Tal, but a bad move is still a bad - definitely not a (!). Also, 23. Nexg5!! is just a pawn grab - nothing to write home.

You also missed a mate with 26. Qh8#, and missed it for the next few moves. Okay, let me now put in my full thoughts:

Avatar of collinsdanielp

26. Qh8#

Avatar of LAexpress12
whisperwalk wrote:

Okay, as I looked, I wasn't particularly impressed with 19. g4!, and so I checked with an engine. It turns out to be actually 19.g4?!, giving up a pawn just to develop Black's rook. So I get it - you want to play like Tal, but a bad move is still a bad - definitely not a (!). Also, 23. Nexg5!! is just a pawn grab - nothing to write home.

You also missed a mate with 26. Qh8#, and missed it for the next few moves. Okay, let me now put in my full thoughts:


h6 is theory

Avatar of LAexpress12

and whisper my rybka 3... i want four...your right it doesnt give g4 a exclamation mark , and i was an idiot for missing Qh8 #, so the machine put dubious marks on everymove that i missed the mate, but it does give Nexg5 double exvclaim marks, because it grabs like 4 pawns worth.

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet

Do you think you'll get a title someday?

Avatar of LAexpress12

me? im 17 and my uscf is like 1850...i hope so

Avatar of LAexpress12

and this WAS a friendly game, so it wasnt like we were all out trying to kill each other

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet
FullmetalAlchemist wrote:

me? im 17 and my uscf is like 1850...i hope so


 How long have you played?

Avatar of jerry2468

There were many mistakes. I don't know...

Avatar of LAexpress12

12 years or so

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet

I haven't played yet.

Avatar of Guest6585958955
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.