What do you call this mate with bishop and knight?

Sort:
Mark_Waterloo
blueemu

Not sure that one has an individual name. It's not one of the usual Model Mate patterns (Damiano, Lolli, Anderssen, Morphy, Paulsen, Epaulettte, etc).

blueemu

There are quite a few of those Knight-and-Bishop mates that lack a specific name. Here's another... carried out in this case by Knight and Queen, but only the Queen's diagonal ability is used in the mating pattern, so it might as well be a Knight-and-Bishop mate.



Sqod

I believe I'm familiar with all the mates that have names, and more that I've given names, and I've never seen a name for this type. How about inventing a name for us? (I'm serious.)

UnbridledOne

I'd call it a one knight stand

BronsteinPawn

Anastasia mate, death cage mate, chili potato mate, check in your face mate, ziggy zug mate, bump mate.

There are a lot, this is different tho, just anme it however your interior poopfeels like.

BronsteinPawn
MeTheBoxLuhst escribió:
UnbridledOne wrote:

I'd call it a one knight stand

 

Mark_Waterloo

blueemu wrote:

There are quite a few of those Knight-and-Bishop mates that lack a specific name. Here's another... carried out in this case by Knight and Queen, but only the Queen's diagonal ability is used in the mating pattern, so it might as well be a Knight-and-Bishop mate.



That one looks a little more forgivable than my example, for which I still can't think of any remotely suitable title so I guess ONS it is.

Sqod

"The Horse Whip"?

UnbridledOne

I like "Horse Whip"     ..The Tail End of The Horse? 

Mark_Waterloo

Sqod wrote:

"The Horse Whip"?

Yes, that's much better! May we all whip our opponents with the horse henceforth!

Artemka3Shianchik11
Mark_Waterloo wrote:
 

Cool

Sqod

It looks like a name for this type of mate already exists, per a thread on this site just one day later: semi-smothered mate. Sorry, I'd never heard of that one before!

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/a-good-chess-player-should-know-these

https://www.chess.com/article/view/tactical-patterns-everyone-should-know-semi-smothered-mate

ilikewindmills
I call it, BISH-IGHT-IS.
Sqod

Now what I want is an example of a second game that used this mate.

blueemu

BTW, that position I gave above (post #3 ITT) is a rare example of a Pawn being pinned against an empty square instead of the more common pin against a major piece. White's Queen on h6 pins the Black g-Pawn against the (empty) mating square f6... which allows White's Rh5 move, forcing mate.

Mark_Waterloo

Thanks Sqod... I still prefer "The Horse Whip" though :-) Blueemu, your comment confirms my earlier feeling that your example was a rather more sophisticated trap than the one in my game. My opponent ought to have seen it coming...

Gil-Gandel
Mark_Waterloo wrote:

Thanks Sqod... I still prefer "The Horse Whip" though :-) Blueemu, your comment confirms my earlier feeling that your example was a rather more sophisticated trap than the one in my game. My opponent ought to have seen it coming...

Nice trap, though. As Black I wouldn't have played ...Nxd4 in the Scotch anyway, but this line punishes it severely and it's far from obvious that Nd5! is going to cause Black so many problems (and that therefore ...h6 was basically unplayable). Well done!

Prachi8101

https://www.chess.com/article/view/tactical-patterns-everyone-should-know-semi-smothered-mate

You call it semi smotherd mate

Mark_Waterloo
Gil-Gandel wrote:
Mark_Waterloo wrote:

Thanks Sqod... I still prefer "The Horse Whip" though :-) Blueemu, your comment confirms my earlier feeling that your example was a rather more sophisticated trap than the one in my game. My opponent ought to have seen it coming...

Nice trap, though. As Black I wouldn't have played ...Nxd4 in the Scotch anyway, but this line punishes it severely and it's far from obvious that Nd5! is going to cause Black so many problems (and that therefore ...h6 was basically unplayable). Well done!


Thanks. I admit I had been on the brink of playing a more mundane move such as Bh4 or Be3, but just sensed there was something more there... :-)