With the help of Stockfish, I bashed in Komodo25's skull.

A breathtaking 96.7 accuracy, I killed the 3200 engine.

Komodo doesn't have a skull.

It is a computer program, just like Stockfish.

If you let Stockfish make all the moves, how is it accurate to say that you even won the game?

I agree. Was it you or was it Stockfish?

I meant "with the help" as in Stockfish did it. Sorry for any confusion.

Who helped who?

Even if stockfish helps you without stockfish you would have gotten bashed in the head by the Komodo 25. As a result, it is more accurate to say that stockfish won this game.

Ok,

So how many moves did you make by totally yourself, without Stockfish's help?

Didn't stockfish bash it?

The arrogance of OP is higher than Stockfishes elo.

but you didnt do anything you just let stockfish do everything, man this reminds me of those school projects where someone does all the work and the partner does nothing but still says they helped 

I get it. Sorry for the mistitling. Let's just say Stockfish did all of it and move on from here.

Why move on?

What you just did, multiple times, was to admit to cheating. To be more specific, you used a chess engine to generate moves. And since this happened on chess.com website, you might be banned from playing here.

Agreed, it was cheating against a computer, but the rules on chess.com for fair play do not only apply to humans, but to all opponents, whether carbon-based, silicon based, pets, space aliens, and even against god himself.

I am not going to report you, but you run the danger that someone else might.

And why waste your time doing this anyway?

I'm not trying to be a hater, but this seems like a completely useless, seemingly boring, and time-consuming use of your time.