me?
1000 Rating
Sort:
Apr 3, 2021
0
#23
even if you are talking to me, dont tell a person higher rating than you to get good, you probably should do that yourself before you tell other people too
Apr 3, 2021
0
#24
xkenzenx wrote:
I know it's not the most calm and polite way to say it but, how the i'm suppose to win a game if my opponents never blunder... I'm at 1000 rating and people play like they're Dubov or Carlsen or some. What is this rating, 1000 player should be absolutely terrible, considering the Gm is 2500 minimum. And yet I get spanked by some players that never blunder the entire games. Seriously i'm infuriating right now almost smash my mouse in half.Even on tight game they nail the perfect route to win this is beyond frustrating... Rating doesnt mean anything on this site.....
When a beginner imagines a GM, they're usually imagining something around 1300 strength.
Apr 3, 2021
0
#26
Ok, I'll give the OP some advice on his games (link to the opening principles at the bottom of this post).
To be fair, I'll look at the first 2 wins and 2 losses for games that lasted over 35 moves (the average game length last time I checked is just below 40). That helps avoid games with big mistakes early on.
I'll give advice, but I'll stop looking as soon as 3 beginner level mistakes were made... with a twist! Since the OP thinks his opponents are GM level, I'll count their mistakes too.
(spoiler only 1 game made it to move 10)
-
-
-
-
-
Opening principles:
https://www.chess.com/article/view/the-principles-of-the-opening
Apr 3, 2021
0
#27
Kenenzx start doing more puzzles and watch some good guys, learn some openings. Each of your opening games is total random.
Apr 3, 2021
0
#28
TheOneTrueJoe2 wrote:
In your most recent game you played 1. a4.
Then you continued to develop none of your pieces for seven moves.
I don't think the problem is other people playing with above-rating accuracy, but that you haven't yet learnt the basics of the game.
Try to develop your pieces and play solidly rather than so many pawn moves. I didn't view the game beyond the opening, so perhaps I have too small of a sample size of your games to comment, but if you play like that in every game then you aren't setting yourself up to win.
I agree as well.
xkenzenx wrote:
I know it's not the most calm and polite way to say it but, how the [removed -- MS] i'm suppose to win a [removed] game if my opponents never blunder... I'm at 1000 rating and people play like they're Dubov or Carlsen or some. What is this rating, 1000 player should be absolutely terrible, considering the Gm is 2500 minimum. And yet I get spanked by some players that never blunder the entire games. Seriously i'm infuriating right now almost smash my mouse in half.Even on tight game they nail the perfect route to win this is beyond frustrating... Rating doesnt mean anything on this site.....
is this a troll post?
BeastGuy2 a écrit :
TheOneTrueJoe2 wrote:
In your most recent game you played 1. a4.
Then you continued to develop none of your pieces for seven moves.
I don't think the problem is other people playing with above-rating accuracy, but that you haven't yet learnt the basics of the game.
Try to develop your pieces and play solidly rather than so many pawn moves. I didn't view the game beyond the opening, so perhaps I have too small of a sample size of your games to comment, but if you play like that in every game then you aren't setting yourself up to win.
I agree as well.
It's cause I try to push my opponents into blundering, by trapping his pieces that are totaly out the field for no reason. I mean i'm not the greatest but nobody with a chess talent does open with a pawn moves and then a super aggresive bishop or queen out, only super amateurish players does that.Its like 50% of the players game at this rank they try to line the queen and the bishop to checkmate you in 2 -3 past that they have nothing in the bag usually. My openings are not my strength i must admit. But i do volontary open repetitively the same ways with cheesy or odds oppenings to see the strength and the weaknesses of getting use to move thoses pawns or pieces out knowing that that i technically should not do.Just to develop my own knowledge and creativity..The thing is at 1000 people should not be able to take advantage of that ,and they don't i still win most of my games.
But sometimes they do and that's when i'm piss , chess is extremely complex and you can see tons of moves ahead, dont tell me the 1000 ratings are transcending the game already...I can get that people barely blunder at 1000 ok but playing such good counterpart on bad openings should not be a thing so low..
Someone putone of my game this game is the worst game i ever played, easily out of 400,its not representative of the way I play.
Apr 3, 2021
0
#31
xkenzenx wrote:
I know it's not the most calm and polite way to say it but, how the [removed -- MS] i'm suppose to win a [removed] game if my opponents never blunder... I'm at 1000 rating and people play like they're Dubov or Carlsen or some. What is this rating, 1000 player should be absolutely terrible, considering the Gm is 2500 minimum. And yet I get spanked by some players that never blunder the entire games. Seriously i'm infuriating right now almost smash my mouse in half.Even on tight game they nail the perfect route to win this is beyond frustrating... Rating doesnt mean anything on this site.....
Just get gud 
Apr 3, 2021
0
#32
Another one of your games:
literally almost every one of your games goes like this, so I'd say it's very representative of your ability
Apr 3, 2021
0
#33
also if you haven't figured out how to prevent a Scholar's mate yet i seriously doubt you're actually as good as you think you are
icyboyyy a écrit :
DaBabysSideTing wrote:
Another one of your games:
literally almost every one of your games goes like this, so I'd say it's very representative of your ability
yeah
Did you read what i just wrote?I'm 179 wins 6 draws and 144 losses.Games where i'm tilted as hell and i blunder over and over because of that aren't representative of my overall play.. Theres tons of games where you make 1 blunder and it makes you loses tons of pieces.Dont tryn'a flex here boy i'm pretty sure i could make you tap out loll Guess i just can't cheese my way up 
Apr 3, 2021
0
#35
xkenzenx wrote:
icyboyyy a écrit :
DaBabysSideTing wrote:
Another one of your games:
literally almost every one of your games goes like this, so I'd say it's very representative of your ability
yeah
Did you read what i just wrote?I'm 179 wins 6 draws and 144 losses.Games where i'm tilted as hell and i blunder over and over because of that aren't representative of my overall play.. Theres tons of games where you make 1 blunder and it makes you loses tons of pieces.Dont tryn'a flex here boy i'm pretty sure i could make you tap out loll Guess i just can't cheese my way up
you gonna make me tap out? bruv if you're talking about chess, my bullet is higher than your rapid, what does that say
also how was i flexin? all im doing is explaining why you're losing games lmao. humble yourself a bit
Apr 3, 2021
0
#36
In this recent game, your opponent blundered away a piece in the opening. Chess: xkenzenx vs HanabiSan - 11181225549 - Chess.com You were winning easily until you blundered away a Rook.
In this game, you again blundered away a Rook in the opening. Chess: xkenzenx vs transiter - 11180595189 - Chess.com
In this game, you blundered away a Knight in the opening. Chess: xkenzenx vs Arturzera - 11179989657 - Chess.com
I don't think there's any problem with your opponents playing perfectly. They make the usual number of errors. The problem is with your situational awareness... overlooking simple threats, blundering pieces, missing strong moves, and so on.
Apr 3, 2021
0
#37
anyone gonna acknowledge the fact that this guy said hes gonna "make me tap out" on a chess forum?? like wtf lmao
xkenzenx wrote:
I know it's not the most calm and polite way to say it but, how the [removed -- MS] i'm suppose to win a [removed] game if my opponents never blunder... I'm at 1000 rating and people play like they're Dubov or Carlsen or some. What is this rating, 1000 player should be absolutely terrible, considering the Gm is 2500 minimum. And yet I get spanked by some players that never blunder the entire games. Seriously i'm infuriating right now almost smash my mouse in half.Even on tight game they nail the perfect route to win this is beyond frustrating... Rating doesnt mean anything on this site.....
You are on the 70,6 percentile, which means you are better than 70,6 percent of the players on this site. https://www.chess.com/stats/live/rapid/xkenzenx#recent
That is the equivalent to:
Gold in Valorant
Master Guardian 1 in CS GO
Platinum is stacraft 2
Gold in league of legends
Platinum in overwatch
Only 29,4 percent to go!
Just play more games and analyse them with the computer. The more you play, the better you become.
I’m a little late to this thread, but I know very well, as a 1000, that other 1000’s make critical mistakes too. I just recently climbed from 916 to 1016 in the space of a few days, and used exactly my opponents mistakes to win, like them missing a simple tactic. In my “best win”, my opponent hung their queen and then abandoned. I will be posting more games later where my opponents made easily visible errors.
Git gud kid