DaBabysSideTing wrote:
this guy said he'd make me "tap out" when he plays 1.a4 and doesnt know how to defend a scholars mate lol
When you have 15 years of karate backing you up but you’re physically weak as hell
1000 Rating
Sort:
wow, this is the longest lasting forum even after cursing. MODS should lock this right now!!
Have a good day,
MT3000
Lol the post is ridiculous. I’m 1600s-1800s and I feel me and my opponents are still terrible at chess. I highly doubt your opponents are playing even remotely good chess. Although “good” is subjective
brain2gain a écrit :
Lol the post is ridiculous. I’m 1600s-1800s and I feel me and my opponents are still terrible at chess. I highly doubt your opponents are playing even remotely good chess. Although “good” is subjective
My original post was about skill disparity in the 1000's range.
Not about others people chess skills or elo unless your in the 1000's range. Coming and saying either ''get good'' or saying '' ''oh im way higher than you and people are still thrash'' not gonna add anything constructive to the topic.
It's more an opinion topic just to know if some people were feeling the same i feel. And some people said they were feeling the same and some came up offering some help to get better wich I appreciate and I consider a great addition.
But coming up this way for an ego boost is questionable considering 99.9% of players if not all the players coming are miles away from proffesional level and would get dismantle piece by piece by any GM's and probably any FIDE titled players would tears you appart easily... Players with actual talent don't do that ^^ * cough in* ''B1z and company, Huhu mhM ''
Apr 6, 2021
0
#46
so....
xkenzenx wrote:
I know it's not the most calm and polite way to say it but, how the [removed -- MS] i'm suppose to win a [removed] game if my opponents never blunder... I'm at 1000 rating and people play like they're Dubov or Carlsen or some. What is this rating, 1000 player should be absolutely terrible, considering the Gm is 2500 minimum. And yet I get spanked by some players that never blunder the entire games. Seriously i'm infuriating right now almost smash my mouse in half.Even on tight game they nail the perfect route to win this is beyond frustrating... Rating doesnt mean anything on this site.....
What is anyone supposed to think when they read a silly comment like this?
Apr 6, 2021
0
#47
bruh its the fact that i gave the guy constructive criticism and the guy started insulting me lmao
xkenzenx wrote:
brain2gain a écrit :
Lol the post is ridiculous. I’m 1600s-1800s and I feel me and my opponents are still terrible at chess. I highly doubt your opponents are playing even remotely good chess. Although “good” is subjective
My original post was about skill disparity in the 1000's range.
Not about others people chess skills or elo unless your in the 1000's range. Coming and saying either ''get good'' or saying '' ''oh im way higher than you and people are still thrash'' not gonna add anything constructive to the topic.
It's more an opinion topic just to know if some people were feeling the same i feel. And some people said they were feeling the same and some came up offering some help to get better wich I appreciate and I consider a great addition.
But coming up this way for an ego boost is questionable considering 99.9% of players if not all the players coming are miles away from proffesional level and would get dismantle piece by piece by any GM's and probably any FIDE titled players would tears you appart easily... Players with actual talent don't do that ^^ * cough in* ''B1z and company, Huhu mhM ''
Most 1700's or 1800's won't go out of their way to insult you if you're 1000, they don't even bother, much less care. But you complained about your fellow 1000's being far better than you when you played incomprehensibly unsound openings and decisions in general, and instead of constructive criticism you just wanted someone to relate to. And I highly recommend not going to all of Chess.com to do this, because not everybody is going to feel sorry for you. Some people are going to try to help you get better. Learn e4 openings, maybe the London, King's Indian Setup, just anything.
Apr 6, 2021
0
#49
SirMigraine wrote:
xkenzenx wrote:
brain2gain a écrit :
Lol the post is ridiculous. I’m 1600s-1800s and I feel me and my opponents are still terrible at chess. I highly doubt your opponents are playing even remotely good chess. Although “good” is subjective
My original post was about skill disparity in the 1000's range.
Not about others people chess skills or elo unless your in the 1000's range. Coming and saying either ''get good'' or saying '' ''oh im way higher than you and people are still thrash'' not gonna add anything constructive to the topic.
It's more an opinion topic just to know if some people were feeling the same i feel. And some people said they were feeling the same and some came up offering some help to get better wich I appreciate and I consider a great addition.
But coming up this way for an ego boost is questionable considering 99.9% of players if not all the players coming are miles away from proffesional level and would get dismantle piece by piece by any GM's and probably any FIDE titled players would tears you appart easily... Players with actual talent don't do that ^^ * cough in* ''B1z and company, Huhu mhM ''
Most 1700's or 1800's won't go out of their way to insult you if you're 1000, they don't even bother, much less care. But you complained about your fellow 1000's being far better than you when you played incomprehensibly unsound openings and decisions in general, and instead of constructive criticism you just wanted someone to relate to. And I highly recommend not going to all of Chess.com to do this, because not everybody is going to feel sorry for you. Some people are going to try to help you get better. Learn e4 openings, maybe the London, King's Indian Setup, just anything.
Complaining about 1000s playing like GMs is literally an invitation to get higher rated players to flame you. And then you make a snarky comment like “guess I can’t play the system or get lucky like you” and expect people to be friendly? Yeah, no.
B1ZMARK wrote:
so....
xkenzenx wrote:
I know it's not the most calm and polite way to say it but, how the [removed -- MS] i'm suppose to win a [removed] game if my opponents never blunder... I'm at 1000 rating and people play like they're Dubov or Carlsen or some. What is this rating, 1000 player should be absolutely terrible, considering the Gm is 2500 minimum. And yet I get spanked by some players that never blunder the entire games. Seriously i'm infuriating right now almost smash my mouse in half.Even on tight game they nail the perfect route to win this is beyond frustrating... Rating doesnt mean anything on this site.....
What is anyone supposed to think when they read a silly comment like this?
just show me a game or two at the 1000 range when people play like "dubov or carlsen"
three
Apr 6, 2021
0
#54
When i start to lose multiple games in a row, i have to look at how im playing an identify my weak points. For me i havent done puzzles in a while. I did 100 endgames course then started studying the CK, then 1c4 then semi slav, i got better as a positional player but lacked in tactics. Its a balancing act of openings middlegame tactics an endgames. Look at your games and try an notice where you need to improve.
Knighthhhh wrote:
six
seven
Apr 6, 2021
0
#58
DaBabysSideTing wrote:
B1Z vs 1000 boy?? if you do post it on here
I have better things to do than play chess against a 1000 rated player, like schoolwork. I just check my phone periodically for notifications.
sometimes it can be annoying although sometimes i find school children flexing on full grown adults funny by saying stuff like "gotta go do hw"
this guy said he'd make me "tap out" when he plays 1.a4 and doesnt know how to defend a scholars mate lol