1000000000000...(1 googleplex) reasons why Chess is Better than Checkers part 1

sure: http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/10000000000001-googleplex-reasons-why-chess-is-better-than-poker

..than checkers, anywhere

You can't underpromote in checkers!

We have queens...............you dont have that in checkers!

Though in retrospect, you can only truly underpromote during bughouse matches. Queens cannot become pawns (absolute underpromotion) in normal chess. . .

In chess there is stalemate, there is no stale mate in checkers

So, um, I guess in summary Chess is a pretty neat game, huh?

we have bishops, knights, and rooks in chess plus our pieces have more variety of moving styles-->vertically

checkers is for six year olds.... i guess that i used to beat people

blue knight checkers kind of have queens there just not as asome

checkers is boring

For me, chess is better than checkers because I know how to play chess :)

In Checkers, you can sacrifice your king.

Who would ever sacrifice a KING?! In Chess, we usually sacrifice the lady, we don't need her anyway

In top level chess, there are three common results - a win for white, a draw and a win for black. Chess has not been solved.

In top level checkers, there is only one common result - a draw. Checkers has been solved.

Two reasons

very true

18 more post till next trophy

chess has a shorter name

there is no bughouse checkers

checkers has an s

there is no thread about 1 googleplex reasons why checkers is better than chess