beg to differ ,
1000000000000...(1 googleplex) reasons why Chess is Better than Checkers part 1

My final addition to this thread, and one that I hope ends all argument:
Chess players are able to learn checkers very quickly. Though the tactics are slightly different, once a chess player knows how to spot them the game seems almost frighteningly simple.
Try teaching chess to a checkers player, and see what happens. The pawns are particularly confusing to them.

I'm most likely the first person to say anything slightly positive about checkers......
here it comes...
It's a nice and relaxing game
So is chess!
you've got to admit that chess can be a lot more tense than checkers.In a nice kind of way!!

Leave Checkers alone.
Odd how he keeps coming up on this site.
From a much, much older thread:

checkers only has 10 million posabilaties...
chess has...[wait for it]
MORE THAN THE NUMBER OF ATOMS IN THE UNIVERSE!!!
(i say that istead of a number becouse the number is to big for me to write)
maybe 10^80
a one followed by 80 zeros

checkers only has 10 million posabilaties...
chess has...[wait for it]
MORE THAN THE NUMBER OF ATOMS IN THE observable UNIVERSE!!!
(i say that istead of a number becouse the number is to big for me to write)
btw, fixed

10 million sounds like an underapproximation.
Just to fix the numbers ... this is from wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_draughts)
"The number of legal positions in English draughts is estimated to be 10^20, and it has a game-tree complexity of approximately 10^40. By comparison, chess is estimated to have between 10^43 and 10^50 legal positions."

10 million sounds like an underapproximation.
Just to fix the numbers ... this is from wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_draughts)
"The number of legal positions in English draughts is estimated to be 10^20, and it has a game-tree complexity of approximately 10^40. By comparison, chess is estimated to have between 10^43 and 10^50 legal positions."
that's wikipedia
Chess is older than checkers.