1000000000000...(1 googleplex) reasons why Chess is Better than Checkers part 1

Sort:
chessgm8

Chess is older than checkers.

danthemasterman

beg to differ ,

DEEPFROGGER

My final addition to this thread, and one that I hope ends all argument:

Chess players are able to learn checkers very quickly. Though the tactics are slightly different, once a chess player knows how to spot them the game seems almost frighteningly simple.

Try teaching chess to a checkers player, and see what happens. The pawns are particularly confusing to them. Laughing

HessianWarrior

@ Haiku575   There was no arguments, everybody is trashing checkers.

goldendog

Leave Checkers alone.

ViktorHNielsen

You cannot make a queen sacrifice in checkers

HessianWarrior

@ goldendog    Good one.

StMichealD

chess is a single digit century invention, checkers was a double digit

Si-Eric
ProfessorXavier211 wrote:
Si-Eric wrote:

I'm most likely the first person to say anything slightly positive about checkers......

here it comes...

It's a nice and relaxing game

So is chess!

you've got to admit that chess can be a lot more tense than checkers.In a nice kind of way!!Laughing. Use left and right arrows to navigate.

TheGrobe
goldendog wrote:

Leave Checkers alone.

Odd how he keeps coming up on this site.

From a much, much older thread:

pdela
ajttja wrote:

checkers only has 10 million posabilaties...

chess has...[wait for it]

 

 

MORE THAN THE NUMBER OF ATOMS IN THE UNIVERSE!!!

(i say that istead of a number becouse the number is to big for me to write)

maybe 10^80

a one followed by 80 zeros

 

pdela
HessianWarrior wrote:

@ goldendog    Good one.

are some dogs called checkers?

pdela
ajttja wrote:

checkers only has 10 million posabilaties...

chess has...[wait for it]

 

 

MORE THAN THE NUMBER OF ATOMS IN THE observable UNIVERSE!!!

(i say that istead of a number becouse the number is to big for me to write)

btw, fixed

StMichealD

30 more posts for next trophy!!

TheGrobe

1,000,000,000 more threads like this please.

Tronchenbiais

10 million sounds like an underapproximation.

Just to fix the numbers ... this is from wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_draughts)

"The number of legal positions in English draughts is estimated to be 10^20, and it has a game-tree complexity of approximately 10^40. By comparison, chess is estimated to have between 10^43 and 10^50 legal positions."

StMichealD
Tronchenbiais wrote:

10 million sounds like an underapproximation.

Just to fix the numbers ... this is from wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_draughts)

"The number of legal positions in English draughts is estimated to be 10^20, and it has a game-tree complexity of approximately 10^40. By comparison, chess is estimated to have between 10^43 and 10^50 legal positions."

that's wikipedia

StMichealD
mashanator wrote:

Posting in a potentially epic thread.

true

KvothDuval
StMichealD wrote:
mashanator wrote:

Posting in a potentially epic thread.

true

not true...

 

i didnt get a trophy for typing 150...

StMichealD
cjt33 wrote:
StMichealD wrote:
mashanator wrote:

Posting in a potentially epic thread.

true

not true...

 

i didnt get a trophy for typing 150...

i meant the post number, sorry, go for post 200

This forum topic has been locked