he won without integrity, by exploitation of a flaw in the system, i know the 3 fold rule, i shouldn't have to click draw when i'm playing a coward, i beat his brain-You didn't beat him, you were beating him until you made a mistake, just because i didn't see some repetitive bull**it doesn't mean that i can't play-No one said you can't play. what self respecting chess player would rather win on time than by mate-I would rather win by mate, but if I can't, winning by time is okay too. i know your rules, it doesn't change the fact of honor and moral code. without integrity you are just a piece of dirt and this man failed to uphold any of that. the time is there to make sure a game doesn't last needlessly, so mistakes can be made.
Look at it from his point of view, he is down a queen and clearly losing, but then you make a mistake allowing him to draw. He then has two options: 1. Take the draw because he would otherwise lose, or 2. Not take the draw and lose. You can't blame him for taking the better option.
He played the best moves on the board, does that mean he doesn't have integrity?
If you did not know about the three-repetition rule, or how it is claimed on chess.com, then bad luck, but you will know next time.
If you knew all of that and refused to take the draw because your philosophical principles state that perpetual should not be a draw, then you are just stupid.