1600s not knowing basics of chess .....Bruh
Sort:
Yes it does
Sep 11, 2021
0
#22
royalknight101 wrote:
M1m1c15 wrote:
Bongcloud is a fools mate, it leads to mate in one
it doesnt
he's talking about this lol
[Site "Chess.com iPhone"]
[Date "09/11/2021 07:44PM"]
[FEN rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1]
[White "White"]
[Black "Black"]
1.e4 e5 2.Ke2 Qh4 3.a3 Qxe4#
[Date "09/11/2021 07:44PM"]
[FEN rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1]
[White "White"]
[Black "Black"]
1.e4 e5 2.Ke2 Qh4 3.a3 Qxe4#
Just an example of what can happen
But to OPs point he could have just not wanted to deal with that situation
Sep 11, 2021
0
#26
I repeat . Bongcloud is moving your king pawn one square ahead and moving your king one square ahead. The game that you just showed is just a specific case of the bongcloud. Its not the only way bongcloud is played
Sep 11, 2021
0
#29
Batman2508 wrote:
He probably wanted to troll or something
Who would resign a game to troll....lol
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
So my opponent with the white pieces decides to play 1f4 (Bird's opening) . I decided to go for e6 , Ke7 (Bongcloud) .
After 78 moves , the position is a dead draw . I have a King and a pawn . However his King has the opposition , so I can't promote. But for some reason that guy thought it was losing and resigned. I can't stop laughing.
Many people don't know that.
Kings opposition is not so easy as it seems. Especially when there is little time for playing.
One should play very accurately.
If Kings opposition would be easy, people didn't post so many video materials about it in youtube.
So what?
You don't have to make a public blog saying that someone doesn't know the basics of the game just because their rating is high.
Sep 11, 2021
0
#33
1670 hanging a piece on move four... ahahahahaha people don't know endgames...
Sep 11, 2021
0
#34
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
You don't have to make a public blog saying that someone doesn't know the basics of the game just because their rating is high.
The implication is that the person is cheating.
Sep 11, 2021
0
#35
Ian_Rastall wrote:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
You don't have to make a public blog saying that someone doesn't know the basics of the game just because their rating is high.
The implication is that the person is cheating.
*that they messed up/lack a fundamental aspect of their game.
ninjaswat escreveu:
Ian_Rastall wrote:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
You don't have to make a public blog saying that someone doesn't know the basics of the game just because their rating is high.
The implication is that the person is cheating.
*that they messed up/lack a fundamental aspect of their game.
Yea, that's not an excuse to make a blog about their lack of knowledge of the game
Isn't that humiliation?
Sep 11, 2021
0
#37
little_guinea_pig wrote:
i got a 2000 who lost from that position once
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Sep 11, 2021
0
#38
AunTheKnight wrote:
little_guinea_pig wrote:
i got a 2000 who lost from that position once
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
sameeeeeee a 2000 stalemated me up 25 points of material in blitz too
Sep 11, 2021
0
#39
Oh, that’s good. Lmao
But I suppose this just further proof that some people just neglect endgames to an exceedingly detrimental extent.
But I suppose this just further proof that some people just neglect endgames to an exceedingly detrimental extent.