2007 is just a number....

Sort:
DonaldoTrump
ChessOfPlayer wrote:
DonaldoTrump wrote:

Congrats on the achievement tho, but tactics are not live chess ratings.

Keep the good work up.

and beating weak computers to inflate your rating is not accurate live ratings...

I could beat you blinfold, I already played 2 games against real 1700-1800 ish opponents and beat them both, stop crying about it, just accept I am better than you. I teach you a lesson today, tomorrow you teach me one.

ChessOfPlayer
DonaldoTrump wrote:
ChessOfPlayer wrote:
DonaldoTrump wrote:

Congrats on the achievement tho, but tactics are not live chess ratings.

Keep the good work up.

and beating weak computers to inflate your rating is not accurate live ratings...

I could beat you blinfold, I already played 2 games against real 1700-1800 ish opponents and beat them both, stop crying about it, just accept I am better than you. I teach you a lesson today, tomorrow you teach me one.

lmfao

Progressant
No it's not. 10 years ago we were all looking forward to it.
Robert_New_Alekhine

You're so much better than me - 800 points in fact. My rating is 1200, since I haven't done a single one. 

seanysean2

I'm 2007 on lichess.org in classical...

sohum3894

The braggard falls down in no time! Down to 1920 from 2007. ;)

seanysean2

1920 is not bad at all.

TheBlunderfulPlayer

Lol, I don't get why you're being so salty!

seanysean2
sohum3894 wrote:

I can reach that rating within 2 months. That's a challenge. Its not any great thing you have done Harish. Your game is still terrible as I saw.

 

      Why so harsh?

TheBlunderfulPlayer

I'm no expert myself, but with his ratings, I wouldn't be running my mouth off on the forums.

spawkle529

sohums just jealous and salty

TheBlunderfulPlayer

That's what I'd assume too. I don't see how Harish is "bragging" or anything.

seanysean2

Yeah

Taulmaril

2352 here.

seanysean2

Nice happy.png

SamDunk722
Taulmaril, I don't want to assume you're cheating or anything, but taking less than minute on most of those tactics seems incredibly difficult, even for titled players. If you don't, please explain.
SamDunk722
And in case you're wondering why I have some that I finished in a few seconds, one was from a famous game, and another was a mate in two, so that's why I finished some quickly
Taulmaril

I just naturally move pretty quickly, whether I get them right or wrong. You can see my solve rate isn't that great but the speed makes up for it. Now if I was taking they little time and solving 80% or more you might have a point.

SamDunk722

Ok, that makes sense. A lot of people do cheat it and I wasn't sure if you just suck at cheating or not

Taulmaril

Nah, just tend to move pretty quickly. I played an OTB tournament last weekend with a 60 minute + 30 second increment time control. At the end of my last round game I had 56 minutes left on the clock after 52 moves. So I was averaging barely over the 30 second increment per move for the game. It's just how I play. Lol