Computer 3D board is nothing like real one for me, I can hardly see anything on the former.
2D Board vs. 3D Board
3d is cool,but i do perfer areal board,specially with cool pieceses.Although it does take time getting use to them,king arthur vs dragons so on.
Did King Arthur ever face a Sicilian Dragon?
I greatly prefer a 3D screen. I have two large monitors (30") and a relatively high-end (well, it was high-end when I bought it 4 months ago) graphics card.
I put the board on one monitor and the controls on the other. I'm going to eventually buy one of those USB DGT chess boards so I can move physical pieces while using a computer chess program (Chess Master 11, Fritz 11 etc...)
I have no use for 2D screens, except when I'm analyzing a game. The top-down perspective bothers me.
* I'm assuming that you are talking about the normal 3D on a 2D display and not stereo 3D. I haven't used the stereo 3D feature of Chessmaster 11 yet. I don't have the 3D glasses. I can't imagine that I'll use it much when I do buy a pair. It strikes me as a mere novelty... but I'll have to see.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
The more D's the better?
Or is it true that when you play too much on a 2D Board, your OTB skills decrease?
(wishes this forum supported polls)