Gil-Gandel wrote:
(I don't use my rating to gain respect)
I should hope you didn't.
it's repsect*
REPSECT, ********* ****** !!!!!
3 reasons Why "Online Chess" ratings deserves no repsect
Sort:
Dec 7, 2013
0
#483
Idrinkyourhealth wrote:
Gil-Gandel wrote:
(I don't use my rating to gain respect)
I should hope you didn't.
it's repsect*
REPSECT, ********* ****** !!!!!
Eggzactly! Rep-sect is a weightlifters cult.
Idrinkyourhealth wrote:
Gil-Gandel wrote:
(I don't use my rating to gain respect)
I should hope you didn't.
it's repsect*
REPSECT, ********* ****** !!!!!
restecp
Some respect has to be earned though...and some won't give it, no matter what...
Online chess may be the only form of chess people play to obtain any sort of "unofficial" rating...
Dec 8, 2013
0
#490
landlubberdolphin wrote:
do you even lift?!?!
Balls and other toys mostly. woof woof
I feel online chess is a great opputunity for people to learn. It's not about the rating (although having a good rating doesn't hurt), I feel playing a lot of games online and sincerely putting good effort on it will eventually help your otb chess
Goodness this forum was dug out from the grave. lol
Ziryab wrote:
I want to know why my Scrabble rating remains so low.
There are plenty of scrabble cheat apps....
Apr 24, 2014
0
#496
nameno1had wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
I want to know why my Scrabble rating remains so low.
There are plenty of scrabble cheat apps....
That's dorta what I thought. The moderators of Scrabble should use Facebook privacy and hacked NSA data to root out the cheats.
Ziryab wrote:
nameno1had wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
I want to know why my Scrabble rating remains so low.
There are plenty of scrabble cheat apps....
That's dorta what I thought. The moderators of Scrabble should use Facebook privacy and hacked NSA data to root out the cheats.
They can also load the app directly through their phone and their is no way to monitor that Facebook. Since they decided the NSA's choice to eavesdrop was unconstitutional, they'd be your only hope but, their hands are tied now.....
tubebender wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
tedthepirate wrote:
Yeah I agree, correspondence chess rating is irrelevent. I don't see how anyone could possibly disagree. Real chess is to play on the spot, with equal, real times. (Yes I know I have a online rating that is the highest. One more game to finish then never again.)
NOOOOO. My correspondence rating is my life. Nothing else matters.
I believe in quality Chess. I play USCF Correspondence Chess; you actually can create beauty.
Chess is chess. It doesn't matter what time control it is because the pieces are always arranged the same way on the board (unless your playing 960 of course), but when it comes down to it, it doesn't matter if the time control is 14 days or 1 minute, its still chess.
Please let dead threads stay dead.
boo
u mean "bump"?
lol...nothing like self promotion...
KA-BOOOOM, more repsect for me