97% got this chess puzzle wrong! Are you the 4%?

Sort:
KeSetoKaiba
BobbyPhisher960 wrote:

Where did Morphy get a TM  just to play like a 2600?

Good question. Perhaps we need to find that machine to go ask Morphy that very question. 2600 is "strong" - but not even world championship caliber anymore; Morphy should have first went into the future to learn how to be a 3500+ or so player first right? Then even Stockfish, Komodo, and the others would be put to shame.

Rat1960

Morphy v Capablanca 1916 Rematch | New York City | Round 8 | 1-0

Really? Clearly not Paul as he died in 1884
Capablanca was playing in the Rice Memorial Tournament



JorisProfile1
Re4+
m_connors

Wow! Did not see that; I'm part of the 97% or is it 96%? Since 97 + 4 = 101, I'm not in that 4% crowd. OP great at chess, math, not so much . . .

cellomaster8
Lyudmil Tsvetkov is my fav man lol
RothKevin

Impressive, The engines can't even find this move Re5

okmeta

even stockfish can't do this! nervous.png

friedmelon

oooooh so the point is to move a5 and not get a perpetural (how to spell it) check and win?

Rocky64

Actually, if you use a desktop browser to access the Stockfish 9 on this site, it finds both 1.Ree5! and 1.Rf4+ as winning in a few minutes.null

It's possible to eliminate the unwanted 1.Rf4+ solution by starting the e1-R on e6 instead, though this means 1.Re5! is a bit less surprising as it stops 1...Qa1+.

null

ChronosTL
NonSequitur7 escribió:
cellomaster8 wrote:
I feel like the OP thinks he’s in the top 4%

I actually am.

 

lol your profile picture and the context made it funny xd

super9001

Very good puzzle. Simple yet Mind Blowing. Thanks for the share, OP. 

superchessmachine

or more

number-0

there are many way to tie

BigBroChess

The correct answer is 3% not 4.

user78003413

OP cannot do math