So nobody?
A Future World Chess Champion from the USA?

"What are your opinions of the possibility of chess player representing the USA becoming World Champion in the next generation?"
Chess is viewed worse than soccer in the US. You will never see chess being promoted to the same degree as basketball or football during the Super Bowl. As a baseball fan, I feel this sport is bit of a dying breed only left to the American purists.
I know this isn't what you are asking specifically, but that is the scope we need to look at. Somehow, the "prodigy" kid must be influenced by chess alongside something such as basketball or even swimming in order to get them really interested. I will mention more about this in your next wondrous query.
"do you believe the USA will ever again produce a world champion?"
I figure Paul Morphy the last real American champion. If you are referring to Fischer, you would be mistaken. Fischer got the title not through honest play but mind games outside of the board. I have no problem with psyching out your opponent over the board, but when you complain, refuse to show up, dispute venue settings, etc... you turn the sport into something it was not. The Russians are not going to be so willing to give another title to an American until that Fischer crap stops.
With that said, Fischer did display immense talent at an early age (or as soon as he learned how to play). This is what will need to happen in addition to training. The training part may be difficult to swallow in the land of a country which ignores the rest of the world and where most citizens don't own a passport.
If there is a future American GM world champion, the time is right. Right now, we have some sense of a unified title and it is there for anyone to get. The parents of this future champion will need to have money. They will need to be able to leave their job, their home, and make many other sacrifices. This future champion will need to be housed in several different countries depending on where their coach is. They will also need financial support and a political team pushing them so they can participate in the key tournaments which will bolster their rating and allow them to play top players. Not even Nakamura was allowed a Candidates seat, but yet he won the London Classic. This chess creation will need connections in the system, not just talent.
Take a lesson from Carlsen, multiply the difficulty due to it being an "American", add sacrifices and there you have at best a chance. Unfortunately, I think American prodigies will come to a different conclusion and pursue their accomplishments in a different way. Even Nakamura is no longer interested in chess. It's only 1 of his many hobbies. This is not chess champion criteria.
Chess needs to be your only hobby, and you kick a soccer ball like Carlsen to fool the world into thinking you are "well-rounded".
Very interesting post. I agree with you in several ways; however I disagree about Fischer.
My opinion is that we certainly have the potential to have several more world champions, maybe one or two in the next generation. We have a great amount of talented individuals, and many with wealthy parents. However, if we do not drastically change our culture soon, chess will be a shunned game for "nerds." As a country we've lost our self-discipline, commitment, and drive to be the best.
I figure Paul Morphy the last real American champion. If you are referring to Fischer, you would be mistaken. Fischer got the title not through honest play but mind games outside of the board.
Come out of your delusion and join us back in reality. Fischer unzipped his pants and urinated on Taimanov, Petroisian, and Spassky. He felt so bad that Spassky was such a weakling that he spotted him a game.
With that said, Fischer did display immense talent at an early age (or as soon as he learned how to play).
Sorry, but that's completely wrong (again). Fischer's rating in 1956, seven years after he learned to play, was 1726.

What are your opinions of the possibility of chess player representing the USA becoming World Champion in the next generation?
Right now all the USA's top talent are longshots at best to compete in those rarified airs, but do you know of any child chess prodigies working their way up the ranks currently that may develop into world contenders should they stay on the straight and narrow?
More broadly speaking, do you believe the USA will ever again produce a world champion? Why or why not?
Thank you.
GM GIRLZILLA

Technically, Caruana was born in America. And grew up almost the same block as Bobby Fischer. I could see him becoming Champion one day. Especially if they keep holding Championships every year, like they have been.

Of course it's quite possible for a next WC from U.S.A., at least statistically. But IMHO the Fischer legacy is something to stay for quite some time.
IF Magnus loses his interest on chess, then there are quite a few players (Naka included) who are candidates for the World Championship... but right now, the Norewgian is in a class of his own. Not just because he is inceribly solid, and makes very few mistakes, but mainly because the "modern" engine-aided preparation, simply does not work against him.

How is everyone not screaming out Hikaru Nakamura like it's the 60's and he's on the Ed Sullivan show?

Nicholas_Shannon80 wrote:
How is everyone not screaming out Hikaru Nakamura like it's the 60's and he's on the Ed Sullivan show?
.
Don't get me wrong. Nakamura is one of my faves. But in my mind, he'll never be a Magnus Carlsen.
He's missing something. Don't know what it is. Accuracy, maybe?

Tal changed his style in his late 20s, abandoning some of the risky play of his youth for positional accuracy, and remained a top ten player for most of his active years. He also set the still-standing record for classical tournment games without a loss, and also holds the second longest undefeated streak. So it can be done.
Good day, Estragon
I thought a more accurate time frame for when Tal changed his style was around age 35, reflected in his unbeaten streaks in 1972 and 1973. Did Tal's change of style begin earlier than that?
That sounds rather dramatic. Why wouldn't there be?
I think the main thing is that chess is seen as more global and that world champions and contenders don't come from the usual Russian/ex-Soviet block all the time.
Caruana obviously has links to Italy, but it also amuses me that when I hear him speak he actually sounds more English than American.
What are your opinions of the possibility of chess player representing the USA becoming World Champion in the next generation?
Right now all the USA's top talent are longshots at best to compete in those rarified airs, but do you know of any child chess prodigies working their way up the ranks currently that may develop into world contenders should they stay on the straight and narrow?
More broadly speaking, do you believe the USA will ever again produce a world champion? Why or why not?
Thank you.