Advice for College Students who Play Chess?

Sort:
CybermanKing

Some background first:

I'm a 24-year-old undergrad history student making roughly $12k/year and expect to graduate in December. My dad first taught me chess when I was in kindergarten or first grade and I fell in love with it. I enrolled in my school's chess club in second and third grade but discontinued as I had no friends interested in the game by the time I was in fourth grade.

I made a Chess.com account over four years ago but never played any online games until December, 2019. By that point, the pandemic peaked and chess was receiving tons of attention from online streamers on Twitch and popularity gained after Netflix's adaptation of "The Queen's Gambit" released. I began playing against friends and bots alike and enjoyed the puzzles as well.

Timed controls bothered me, so I stayed with Rapid and played consistently against players with an ELO rating of above 1,000. Nelson, a 1300-rated bot, gave me troubles at first but I managed to defeat him and now practice against the computer at the 1400 level. Unfortunately, I began to do worse and worse the more I played. One year ago today, my ELO peaked to 1082. Right now, it sits at 825, even though bots below 1300 don't give me any problems. Over 75% of the time I play as Black, I lose and only half the time I play as White do I win.

I want to play better chess or at least do as well as I did a year ago. However, I'm a fulltime university student making very little money each year so a chess coach, books, a premium membership, and anything else that requires money or several hours a week of study are not plausible solutions. So bearing that in mind and recognizing also my weaknesses on the board (poor time management, failing to recover after a blunder, making poor moves, etc.), how do I do better at chess as a college student? Does it just come down to memory and spatial awareness on the board with tactics such as pins, forks, castling at the right time, discovered attacks, openings, endgame, etc.? If that's all there is to it, how come I still do so terrible the more I play?

Chess_Player_lol
CybermanKing wrote:

Some background first:

I'm a 24-year-old undergrad history student making roughly $12k/year and expect to graduate in December. My dad first taught me chess when I was in kindergarten or first grade and I fell in love with it. I enrolled in my school's chess club in second and third grade but discontinued as I had no friends interested in the game by the time I was in fourth grade.

I made a Chess.com account over four years ago but never played any online games until December, 2019. By that point, the pandemic peaked and chess was receiving tons of attention from online streamers on Twitch and popularity gained after Netflix's adaptation of "The Queen's Gambit" released. I began playing against friends and bots alike and enjoyed the puzzles as well.

Timed controls bothered me, so I stayed with Rapid and played consistently against players with an ELO rating of above 1,000. Nelson, a 1300-rated bot, gave me troubles at first but I managed to defeat him and now practice against the computer at the 1400 level. Unfortunately, I began to do worse and worse the more I played. One year ago today, my ELO peaked to 1082. Right now, it sits at 825, even though bots below 1300 don't give me any problems. Over 75% of the time I play as Black, I lose and only half the time I play as White do I win.

the bots rating are infalated which will explain why the bots below 1300 arent a problem for you. 

I want to play better chess or at least do as well as I did a year ago. However, I'm a fulltime university student making very little money each year so a chess coach, books, a premium membership, and anything else that requires money or several hours a week of study are not plausible solutions. So bearing that in mind and recognizing also my weaknesses on the board (poor time management, failing to recover after a blunder, making poor moves, etc.), how do I do better at chess as a college student? Does it just come down to memory and spatial awareness on the board with tactics such as pins, forks, castling at the right time, discovered attacks, openings, endgame, etc.? If that's all there is to it, how come I still do so terrible the more I play?

chess does require a lot of spatial awareness for tactics of all kinds but there is a lot more to it. Chess also requires knowledge of when to trade pieces, how to improve your position, creating an attack/preparing an attack. Getting better at chess is going to require you to hone your skill on 'basic' principles like openings, endgames, castling at the right time, etc. 

There are many ways to learn chess, by far the best option imo is looking on youtube and learn about these subjects, and play games trying to use your knowledge. I really reccomend looking at Chessvibes and Gothamchess. I understand that you are in college so your proggress will be slow, but i believe yojcan reach 1200 by the end of this year if you spend 3-5 hours a week on chess.

Also you might be tired and stressed about college so it may contribute to a lower rating. 

 

Hope this helped

blueemu

I think situational awareness is more important in chess than spatial awareness. At the 1000 level, most games are lost due to simple one-move blunders that could easily be avoided if the player could just remain alert and notice enemy (and friendly) threats and opportunities.

CybermanKing
Chess_Player_lol wrote:

Hope this helped

More or less. Why are the bots inflated? Wouldn't it make more sense to match their ELO with those of real players?

technical_knockout

daily games trying for 'best' moves.

CybermanKing
technical_knockout wrote:

daily games trying for 'best' moves.

What about for good old Rapid?

PuzzleTraining_20onTwitch

I am in college, my third year, if you really do love chess you will always find time. Playing games is the best way to improve, as well as analysing and doing puzzles. You can analyse your games using engines and/or different websites if you do not have a membership here and do puzzles on chess tempo.

technical_knockout

you said time controls were bothersome:

daily takes the pressure off, allowing you to consistently blunder-check & try for optimal usage of each turn.  3, 6, 12, 24 hrs. or more per move are some flexible options for a college student & simultaneous games are possible if you get bored playing just one... also suggest lessons & puzzles.

CybermanKing
technical_knockout wrote:

you said time controls were bothersome:

daily takes the pressure off, allowing you to consistently blunder-check & try for optimal usage of each turn.  3, 6, 12, 24 hrs. or more per move are some flexible options for a college student & simultaneous games are possible if you get bored playing just one... also suggest lessons & puzzles.

But with multiple hours, doesn't that also allow for the opportunity for my opponent (and perhaps even me) to cheat using outside tools? It's a double-edged sword. Blitz and Bullet are too fast for me but Rapid allows for the reassurance I'm not going up against someone who simply wants his ELO inflated by using Lichess on another browser window.

tygxc

#1

"Timed controls bothered me, so I stayed with Rapid" ++ Yes 15|10 is best
"Over 75% of the time I play as Black, I lose and only half the time I play as White do I win."
++ play more carefully with black. Black is OK.

"I want to play better chess or at least do as well as I did a year ago."
++ Always check your intended move is no blunder before you play it
"a chess coach, books, a premium membership, and anything else that requires money"
++ You need no coach. A good book costs $20 and gives you 200 h of top coaching.
"several hours a week of study"
++ Time is more of a problem. You need to invest 200 h if you want to get to 2000.
"poor time management" ++ playing too fast is the most common mistake.
Start 15|10 at 40 s / move and finish at 10 s / move
"failing to recover after a blunder"
++ You cannot recover, you have to avoid blunders in the first place
"making poor moves" ++ think longer
"how do I do better at chess as a college student?" ++ Analyse your lost games
"Does it just come down to memory" ++ No, chess must not be memorised
"spatial awareness on the board with tactics such as pins, forks" ++ Yes, tactics are very important
"castling at the right time" ++ The sooner, the better
"discovered attacks" ++ Yes, tactics
"openings" ++ No, not at all
"endgame" ++ Yes
"how come I still do so terrible the more I play?" ++ Blunder prevention

technical_knockout

cheaters eventually get caught & your rating points will be adjusted accordingly.

daily is an excellent time control for fitting chess into a busy schedule.  you 'want to play better chess'?  scrap the bots... they are always either laughably weak or will crush you without so much as a hope.

study lessons & solve lots of puzzles to improve;

play daily to leisurely practice what you've learned;

analyze every game after it ends to consider where you went wrong & to check for suspected cheating.

you created this thread for advice:  there you go.

RussBell

@CybermanKing

You're statement...

".....anything else that requires.....several hours a week of study are not plausible solutions."

Appears to indicate a reluctance to put in the effort required to play better chess.

However, should you adopt a different perspective, you might discover something helpful here...

Improving Your Chess - Resources for Beginners and Beyond

https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell/improving-your-chess-resources-for-beginners-and-beyond

also note that...

The following rules apply to ANY GAME CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS:

• For “Live” games (as in ‘over-the-board’ (OTB) games) it is ILLEGAL to consult or employ ANY external aid or resource, including human assistance.
• For “Daily” games (as in ‘correspondence’ chess) it is LEGAL to consult passive resources such as books, articles, online databases, opening explorers, etc. However, it is ILLEGAL to use computers/chess engines to calculate moves, or to consult with another human about the game,

So unlike "Live" games, "Daily" chess allows one to learn by employing passive resources while simultaneously playing - doing so is not cheating.

Chess_Player_lol
CybermanKing wrote:
Chess_Player_lol wrote:

Hope this helped

More or less. Why are the bots inflated? Wouldn't it make more sense to match their ELO with those of real players?

idk why bots ratings are higher, maybe it is because chesscom has much more important things to fix. but whatever the reason is bots ratings are inflated

AyanMazumdar1

I would suggest you to read some basic books. If those are not easy to come by, hire a private and cheap coach if you're serious(not listed on chess.com). Since they are not yet established, they will do for a very cheap rate and more time. Find someone who is high rated and message privately. That way, you'll get your basics right and get your elo going up.

CybermanKing
technical_knockout wrote:

you created this thread for advice:  there you go.

Thank you

technical_knockout

🙂

max0618

I'm a college senior who loves playing chess. I would love to play you. I play 30 minute games. Playing with someone whose score is higher can be great for learning.

OranegJuice

Do puzzles and play more games. It'll build board vision which is pretty much the only thing that matters if you're stuck under 1000 chess.com rating.

francis20110

Stick to at least 15/10 games, and play on the other chess site beginning with "L" so you can analyse your games for free and see missed opportunities or what went wrong. Try to complete at least a few chess puzzles every day.

goodmanwleticia957

Improving at chess doesn't necessarily require expensive chess coaches or premium memberships.