14817 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hey, all. I was wondering if you could give me some feedback? I'm writing a minichess program for the iOS/OS X and I am considering what would be the best initial setup of pieces. If you are unfamiliar with minichess, there is a wikipedia article Wikipedia: Minichess.
I have decided to implement a 5x6 variant with a KQRBN back row (not necessarily in that order). Instead of just choosing one set order for the back row, I have made it random. Well, semirandom.
The way I am currently setting up White's pieces is I am starting with an normal 8x8 white back row.
Then I am randomly eliminating on of each of the paired back row pieces. For example, this would be a legal back row for white via this approach.
RxBQKxNx , which would yield a back row on the 5x6 board of ....
While semirandom, I like this approach because it maintains some of the inherent relationship of the back row pieces that you see in regular chess, such as rooks starting in the corner, bishops adjacent to either the Q or K, and queen and king adjacent to each other.
The black back row then is randomly set to be either an exact mirroring of the white back row (as in full chess) or the exact reverse order.
I like having the 50/50 chance of a reverse ordering because it increases the variability of the board but it gives me qualms to have a setup where the black king is on a lower file than the queen. It is not a completely novel idea though as both the 5x6 variants Speed Chess and Elena Chess (see the wikipedia article) have this relationship. What do you think?
The alternatives would be to no allow a reverse black setup (bleh) or to allow a reverse setup, but to keep the expected orientation of QK. I'm currently not favoring the later approach as it would lead to some very asymmetrical board, with, for example, one player starting with a queen in the corner and the other not.
Other rules questions are should pawn double moves (w/ en passant capture), pawn promotion and castling be allowed? My current implimentation allows double moves and promotion. Castling is allowed, but only if the queen or king start in a corner (which would mean that castling would be "full sized").
Well, what do you think? I am far from the first person to try to come up with a good setup for a 5x6 minichess game. I would love any feedback from this forum on setup, pawn movement/promotion or castling in this type of chess variant.
why not 6x6?
Maybe try to figure out the 8x8 version first, before introducing new games?
Best excuse for losing
by TOQATEST a few minutes ago
draw for insufficient material
by pwned-again 3 minutes ago
GM Hikaru Nakamura Reaches 3200 Bullet Rating [YOUTUBE]
by falcon-gw 4 minutes ago
by Kakamou12 5 minutes ago
Statistics for the chess.com site...?
by notmtwain 6 minutes ago
How's this white response to Caro Kann?
by newengland7 8 minutes ago
by AlexCampbell 11 minutes ago
what do you guys think im my playing style?
by Jenium 11 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by CamelsOfYaQub 13 minutes ago
2/11/2016 - Casas-Piazzini, Buenos Aires 1952
by subham_behera 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!