Obviously a fake game.
against the computer on this site
hows that a fake game ? i played it ? whats the link about ? why dont no 1 on here beleave anything i put maybe jelous i say i can beat arasan most times people beleave me but draw against rybka on repetative moves oh no,beat that program on here why would i waste my time un making them moves up ?
Your win obviously stems from the huge blunder 8. ... 0-0?? that I doubt the LittleChess Partner would make if you didn't force it to move. No engine plays that badly. And then, it plays 9. ... gxf6?? which is another equally gross blunder when clearly almost anyone would play 9. ... Qxf6. It may not be faked, per se, but it's definitely rigged. Even the Easy computer wouldn't make such a horrible pair of consecutive blunders.
And the computers on Live Chess are pretty good, and they only take like 2 seconds/move.
well i cant say what happened i new it was a blunder i just beat it again in 39 moves that time my heads hurting after that game i will post
well weres the Impossible chess program on here then ? ive already beated that chess program two times in a row
hows that a fake game ? i played it ? whats the link about ? why dont no 1 on here beleave anything i put maybe jelous i say i can beat arasan most times people beleave me but draw against rybka on repetative moves oh no,beat that program on here why would i waste my time un making them moves up ?
i don't believe anyone whose only punctuation used are question marks.
I think that management should be contacted and there should be an investigation!!!! just thinking outloud.....................
do an ivestigation and contact the management what have i done wrong played a free program on here and beaten it whooopy do
jelously i put it down to whats wrong with putting question marks i cant beleave people are being so petty about it
He beat little chess partner on hard, I feel the jealousy welling up in me.
You can find the impossible one by going to play, live chess.
You guys are delusional. Someone rated over 2000 playing as Black plays the following opening moves:
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 (Caro Kann mainline) 3. Nc3 Be6?
Seriously, who plays 3. Be6? in the Caro mainline? C'mon now! The 25 second rule is obviously screwing with the computer's true play strength. You have to just let it move, and honestly, it doesn't take very long to move.
He beat little chess partner on hard, I feel the jealousy welling up in me.
You can find the impossible one by going to play, live chess.
Wow, he beat Little Chess Partner, rated about 2000!
Very impressive.
If he forces the computer to move after 25 seconds, then it is not playing at its true strength. Moreover, it is only estimated that the computer plays at 2000. The overwhelming opinion is that it plays much weaker.
Take a look at the opening 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 (book) 3. Nc3 Be6??
yes i know, but these guys seem to think it is unbeatable i dont understand at all they seem to beleave me when i say i can beat arasan most times but then say ive had one draw against rybka on repetative moves and about 100 and odd loses they dont beleave me , i dont know what to call it apart from jelous and people on this site try to belittle you over it , its a disgrace and distasteful
yes i know, but these guys seem to think it is unbeatable i dont understand at all they seem to beleave me when i say i can beat arasan most times but then say ive had one draw against rybka on repetative moves and about 100 and odd loses they dont beleave me , i dont know what to call it apart from jelous and people on this site try to belittle you over it , its a disgrace and distasteful
for me it's not jealousy. it's lack of punctuation...and jealousy.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
deleate please