Am I like no good? - Chess Forums - Page 2

blueemu

Apr 17, 2022

0

#21

RaufUsSabid7 wrote:

I have some very nice victories over players rated 1700-2200 in Daily every now and then and am in good form but today I went to play a multi-club arena and in 2 games against a 1850 and a 2050 I got my soul sucked out like no joke. Does it mean I'm actually garbage at chess?

Former World Chess Champion Vishy Anand once lost a Knight and resigned on move 6, in a tournament game.

Does that mean that he's garbage at chess?

YankeeBastid

Apr 17, 2022

0

#22

fyi, here is a complete list of rateings when there were 6,015,760 members

100	89717	0.014914
200	195111	0.032433
300	328633	0.054629
400	470841	0.078268
500	572374	0.095146
600	631917	0.105044
700	628286	0.104440
800	594633	0.098846
900	516472	0.085853
1000	442244	0.073514
1100	359953	0.059835
1200	293519	0.048792
1300	230314	0.038285
1400	177690	0.029537
1500	135053	0.022450
1600	101053	0.016798
1700	74537	0.012390
1800	54458	0.009053
1900	38479	0.006396
2000	29077	0.004833
2100	19299	0.003208
2200	12724	0.002115
2300	8153	0.001355
2400	5143	0.000855
2500	2500	0.000416
2600	1744	0.000290
2700	1020	0.000170
2800	490	0.000081
2900	220	0.000037
3000	90	0.000015
3100	14	0.000002
3200	2	0.000000

Optimissed

Apr 17, 2022

0

#23

RaufUsSabid7 wrote:

Alexandr_Kozin wrote:

No, of course. Just look the truth. Only here on this site a player with a rating 1100 can beat 1900 or, for example, 1500 can beat 2100. In OTB, this will never happen, or the probability of this is minimal.There are a lot of people here who use hints. It's true!

Yes but it very much hurts. If you wanna pass like 1600 you've to practise beating people above them which I can't do consistently

You wouldn't be able to do it consistently unless you were 1800+ because there are plenty of people rated, say, 1620 who are capable of beating a 1750 if they're playing well.

andrewdowden

Apr 17, 2022

0

#24

YankeeBastid wrote:

fyi, here is a complete list of rateings when there were 6,015,760 members

100 89717 0.014914 200 195111 0.032433 300 328633 0.054629 400 470841 0.078268 500 572374 0.095146 600 631917 0.105044 700 628286 0.104440 800 594633 0.098846 900 516472 0.085853 1000 442244 0.073514 1100 359953 0.059835 1200 293519 0.048792 1300 230314 0.038285 1400 177690 0.029537 1500 135053 0.022450 1600 101053 0.016798 1700 74537 0.012390 1800 54458 0.009053 1900 38479 0.006396 2000 29077 0.004833 2100 19299 0.003208 2200 12724 0.002115 2300 8153 0.001355 2400 5143 0.000855 2500 2500 0.000416 2600 1744 0.000290 2700 1020 0.000170 2800 490 0.000081 2900 220 0.000037 3000 90 0.000015 3100 14 0.000002 3200 2 0.000000

One of the 3200 players was White_Ghost, but what the other one?

Alexandr_Kozin

Apr 17, 2022

0

#25

Reaper3214 написал:

RaufUsSabid7 wrote:

Alexandr_Kozin wrote:

No, of course. Just look the truth. Only here on this site a player with a rating 1100 can beat 1900 or, for example, 1500 can beat 2100. In OTB, this will never happen, or the probability of this is minimal.There are a lot of people here who use hints. It's true!

Yes but it very much hurts. If you wanna pass like 1600 you've to practise beating people above them which I can't do consistently

Look, nobody said that it was easy to win in chess. Losing always hurts, but it's also the only way to get better. No matter how hard you got beaten, you need to stop wondering WHY you lost, and look to HOW you can win.

Just answer me to the question.

Who plays chess better, the one who plays 1 year or the one who plays 10 years? Experience is important and that's what allows you to win. Experience and talent, yes. And so it was in the 20th century. But in the 21st century, His Majesty's computer program has made EVERYONE equal. Yes, i agree that it's hard to win, but hints make it easy, very easy. This is an easy way and it is available to everyone.

DrSpudnik

Apr 17, 2022

0

#26

Everyone has a terrible day. You just aren't special in that regard. So dust yourself off and get back at it after a period of rest and reorganization.

NM Kowarenai

Apr 17, 2022

0

#27

it doesnt really, you just got outplayed by better players or imo had bad luck which i can relate

NM Kowarenai

Apr 17, 2022

0

#28

SOurskitles wrote:

You bad, go LICK rats and their holes like JEBKO once said HAHAHA JEBKO IS GREATEST EVER

you sound sussie mr.sussie boi

DrSpudnik

Apr 17, 2022

0

#29

Kowarenai wrote:

SOurskitles wrote:

You bad, go LICK rats and their holes like JEBKO once said HAHAHA JEBKO IS GREATEST EVER

you sound sussie mr.sussie boi

He sounds like the kind of typical numbskull on this site who thinks he's funny but has no idea how childish he comes across.

NM Kowarenai

Apr 17, 2022

0

#30

yes yes but one question do you or do you not know about the bird DrSpudnik...

hugebike48

Apr 17, 2022

0

#31

blueemu wrote:

RaufUsSabid7 wrote:

I have some very nice victories over players rated 1700-2200 in Daily every now and then and am in good form but today I went to play a multi-club arena and in 2 games against a 1850 and a 2050 I got my soul sucked out like no joke. Does it mean I'm actually garbage at chess?

Former World Chess Champion Vishy Anand once lost a Knight and resigned on move 6, in a tournament game.

Does that mean that he's garbage at chess?

ohhhhhhhhhhh

hugebike48

Apr 17, 2022

0

#32

andrewdowden wrote:

YankeeBastid wrote:

fyi, here is a complete list of rateings when there were 6,015,760 members

100 89717 0.014914 200 195111 0.032433 300 328633 0.054629 400 470841 0.078268 500 572374 0.095146 600 631917 0.105044 700 628286 0.104440 800 594633 0.098846 900 516472 0.085853 1000 442244 0.073514 1100 359953 0.059835 1200 293519 0.048792 1300 230314 0.038285 1400 177690 0.029537 1500 135053 0.022450 1600 101053 0.016798 1700 74537 0.012390 1800 54458 0.009053 1900 38479 0.006396 2000 29077 0.004833 2100 19299 0.003208 2200 12724 0.002115 2300 8153 0.001355 2400 5143 0.000855 2500 2500 0.000416 2600 1744 0.000290 2700 1020 0.000170 2800 490 0.000081 2900 220 0.000037 3000 90 0.000015 3100 14 0.000002 3200 2 0.000000

One of the 3200 players was White_Ghost, but what the other one?

i think orange ghost?

andrewdowden

Apr 17, 2022

0

#33

hugebike48 wrote:

andrewdowden wrote:

YankeeBastid wrote:

fyi, here is a complete list of rateings when there were 6,015,760 members

100 89717 0.014914 200 195111 0.032433 300 328633 0.054629 400 470841 0.078268 500 572374 0.095146 600 631917 0.105044 700 628286 0.104440 800 594633 0.098846 900 516472 0.085853 1000 442244 0.073514 1100 359953 0.059835 1200 293519 0.048792 1300 230314 0.038285 1400 177690 0.029537 1500 135053 0.022450 1600 101053 0.016798 1700 74537 0.012390 1800 54458 0.009053 1900 38479 0.006396 2000 29077 0.004833 2100 19299 0.003208 2200 12724 0.002115 2300 8153 0.001355 2400 5143 0.000855 2500 2500 0.000416 2600 1744 0.000290 2700 1020 0.000170 2800 490 0.000081 2900 220 0.000037 3000 90 0.000015 3100 14 0.000002 3200 2 0.000000

One of the 3200 players was White_Ghost, but what the other one?

i think orange ghost?

Yeah, I think orange_ghost is the other one, thanks for answering my question

RaufUsSabid7

Apr 18, 2022

0

#34

Also if you look at my losses I just play like a toilet when I lose

Donnsteinz

Apr 18, 2022

0

#35

Yes, you do.

andrewdowden

Apr 18, 2022

0

#36

What do you mean by that?

blueemu

Apr 18, 2022

0

#37

RaufUsSabid7 wrote:

Also if you look at my losses I just play like a toilet when I lose

One of the hardest aspects of chess it to try to defend accurately and actively while under heavy enemy attack. Almost anyone can play well when things are going smoothly for them.

fjb7

Apr 18, 2022

0

#38

I doubt it. Daily is the closest to otb you can get. If your using the analysis board or opening hints consistently. As well as thinking about the position for 15+ mins. It can give a little bit of a false rating vs otb. I’m no where near your rating but mine has been steadily climbing. I just had my first rated otb game. I won against a player who was rated about 200 points higher than I’m rated on here and won.

It’s hard to go by the ratings on here.

MisterWindUpBird

Apr 18, 2022

0

#39

Chess is a lifetime hobby. Time is on your side. If you actually learn things from your losses you're making progress.

NM tactic

Apr 18, 2022

0

#40

I used to be stuck around 1300 up till around two years ago. Up till then, I relied almost purely on intuition and never took time to take the game seriously. I did well in some National events, and was in contention for top 100 for my age, but I never really made any progress. Chess really was more of some careless hobby that I'd play ever so often. However, halfway through quarantine, I stumbled across some old chess articles I had scattered around my room. I read through some of the chess articles, and that passion that was ignited so long ago when I was first learning the game was invigorated. I had decided that I'd actually try to study chess for the first time in my life.

Keep in mind I was around 1600 blitz online when I started to pick chess back up again. I studied like a madman. I never did so much to as pick up a book (god forbid books) but I watched videos, solved puzzles, played some rapid games, and looked through and tried to improve my weaknesses. Of course, even then I did not play as many games as I do now, but I still got that exposure that I was missing before. Slowly, I started to piece together ideas, and those ideas formed concepts, of which I was able to apply in-game.

Chances are, you're young and you have plenty of opportunity to become a great chess player. Don't shun temporary failure, and look at the big picture and look at all the success you've achieved. The fact you're on this site means that you're seriously into chess. Once you're hooked, you're already a GM