Anatoly Karpov

Sort:
Eternal_Patzer

Right you are!  I have the book but haven't read it through, and didn't realize this gem was in the last chapter.  Thanks!

TheOldReb
RobertABrown wrote:

This is what Kasparov has to say about the incident. 

" The five days spent in captivity became a fundamentally new reference point in my relations with people. From  behind bars, everything, as in chess, is seen in black and white – many expressed their solidarity, but there were also those who did ot pass the test of elementary decency. Anatoly Karpov made an attempt to visit me in prison - the solidarity of champions proved stronger than plitical and personal disagreements! He was not able to do this: the authorities, who did not allow any lawyers to see me, did not make an exception for Karpov. But in the new system of coordinates his goodwill gesture outweighed all the negative factors which had accumulated during our long years of confrontation. (emphasis added)" 

from Kasparov vs. Karpov 1975-1985 (part two)


 Until now I did not know about this. Amazing ! It makes me thing better of Karpov as a human being ! I have always thought well of him as a chess player and champion. If you want to know who your real friends are its the ones who come to you during adversity to help, or lend support. When you are moving real friends will offer to help ! I was always moved by the fact that the only player to visit Tal during a tournament in which Tal had to be hospitalized was Fischer ! I was unpleasantly surprised by the fact that none of his countrymen visited him in the hospital, they must have hearts of stone. Fischer seemed to have a true friendship with few soviet players and Tal was one of them.

grayjaguar

Karpov was a real socialist, in the sense that he praises humanity and solidarity.

chessmaster102
Can someone also post a Jose Raul Capablanca game to
CPawn

Its to bad that we never got a chance for a Fischer vs. Karpov Championship match.

CPawn
richie_and_oprah wrote:

Agreed. 

It is probably one of the most fraught-over 'almosts' we have in chess.


 I am a HUGE Korchnoi fan, and when those two went at it i was wishing bad things on Karpov.  Now that im older and wiser, i can appreciate how truely great he is.  And his best games books are some of the best when it comes to studying.

TheOldReb
richie_and_oprah wrote:

Korchnoi the chess player is a fantastic thing.  Amazing.  

 

Maybe THE strongest guy to never get the crown? 


 My pick is between Korchnoi and Keres for that title, both great players, and both were screwed by the system under which they played I believe.

goldendog

A fantasy tournament with the best of the #2s: Korchnoi, Keres, Rubinstein....

CPawn
Reb wrote:
richie_and_oprah wrote:

Korchnoi the chess player is a fantastic thing.  Amazing.  

 

Maybe THE strongest guy to never get the crown? 


 My pick is between Korchnoi and Keres for that title, both great players, and both were screwed by the system under which they played I believe.


I think you need to put Reshevsky right up there with Korchnoi and Keres.

ozzie_c_cobblepot

What about Bronstein? I put him before Sammy.

TheOldReb

Schlecter also came very close against the mighty Lasker.

ozzie_c_cobblepot

I don't know, I'm pretty down on Lasker, relatively speaking, because he got trounced by Capablanca. It's almost like he didn't really know how to play, when you compare them.

I know I'm probably being too hard on him, especially because I think of his style and Korchnoi's as pretty similar, and I'm a big Korchnoi fan.

CPawn
ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

I don't know, I'm pretty down on Lasker, relatively speaking, because he got trounced by Capablanca. It's almost like he didn't really know how to play, when you compare them.

I know I'm probably being too hard on him, especially because I think of his style and Korchnoi's as pretty similar, and I'm a big Korchnoi fan.


Im not a big lasker fan either.  I have a problem with him not playing Tarrasch until after his prime, defending the title against Marshall? Janowski?, and then puts off playing Capa as long as possible?

goldendog
CPawn wrote:
ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

I don't know, I'm pretty down on Lasker, relatively speaking, because he got trounced by Capablanca. It's almost like he didn't really know how to play, when you compare them.

I know I'm probably being too hard on him, especially because I think of his style and Korchnoi's as pretty similar, and I'm a big Korchnoi fan.


Im not a big lasker fan either.  I have a problem with him not playing Tarrasch until after his prime, defending the title against Marshall? Janowski?, and then puts off playing Capa as long as possible?


 It was Tarrasch who put off the match, not Lasker as I recall. Lasker was very great. Capa valued him as a player above all, even Alekhine.

Mikhail007

I think Korchnoi got screwed the most. Theres no way anyone can play good chess when the 'system' is messing with your family members.

goldendog

"One time back in 1994 the Dali Lama was asked: French Revolution, good or bad?

His answer: Too soon to tell."

Usually attributed to chou en lai.

Knightsight

I went off Korchnoi a bit when I saw in the free videos section of this site his game against Polgar.  He got arrogant after his loss.  Lost his dignity a bit.  Shame.

www.chess.com/free-videos

TheOldReb
Knightsight wrote:

I went off Korchnoi a bit when I saw in the free videos section of this site his game against Polgar.  He got arrogant after his loss.  Lost his dignity a bit.  Shame.

www.chess.com/free-videos


 I dont know why people make such a big deal of this myself, after seeing it. Polgar upset a great player who is getting old then after the game she made some remark that he didnt respond to very well/professionally. Big deal ! I think her comment was taken by Viktor as a bit of gloating , rubbing salt into the fresh wound. If so this would explain his reaction. I think she shouldnt have said anything after winning the game. I do think his reaction was uncalled for but so was her comment after the game. I just dont see his response as the horrible crime that some seem to see it as. Supposedly Nimzovich once proclaimed loudly , after a loss, "why must I lose to this idiot" and yet I dont see anyone attacking him for what I view as a much worse breach of sportsmanship. Why ? Alekhine once resigned by hurling his king across the room as well !  Have you never had a reaction to a loss that you arent too proud of ? I have but its just one instance from more than 30 years of tournament play....

avneet

they are all good palyers

avneet

topalov played some wierd moves