Anti evolution forum. Everybodys welcome.

ok so a question , which species's are you referring to that has half an arm , or half a leg , or half a beak ?

I can think of none but ive just looked at your 325 post so haven't thought about it for long ,

I think it interesting btw that you mention beaks , as birds beaks are a good sign of evolution , each different one fitting a specific feeding pattern be that a curlews long thin mud probing one or an eagles sharp flesh tearing one ,

Nobody answered me tho

they evolved those beaks to fit their particular nutritional needs , I doubt you will agree but take a moment and think about it before dismissing it

Look at post 359

It's about the bats

that can happen , when you get no response to a post , but now you have , granted I have my bias and ive used your question to present a point that favours my view but it is something I think helps refute anti evolution ,

FYI, I found post 359 in my science text book. I'm not making things up

well bats , I see you mention "flying mice" but perhaps a very close relative might be a flying squirrel , although a bat is birdlike in bone structure in regards to how the flesh is attached to its arm

, the survival of the fittest and pointing to how hollow bones might imply weakness though ,,, to fly a body mass needs to be light this includes bone density , so they are evolved to suit that purpose (hollow bones)

They keep saying show me the evidence against evolution but then when I show them something significant they ignore it. Also I'm not saying my view point is science so I do not need to prove it. You guys insist your point of view is science so the burden of proof is yours and not mine.

ahh I stand corrected , an animal need not be light to fly

for lulz , as taking things seriously all the time isn't my thing

And I still do not know how reproduction organs evolved. You need them to evolve them

im gonna disagree , with your last post re scientific proof of creationism , but I guess you knew I would , I am however very aware you are limited by cc forum rules on expanding on your view , but I will point out that I have presented quite a few points from archaeologists , geologsts , botanists to show that evolution has proof coming out of its ears if you care to listen

Or how did animals evolve the desire to reproduce.  Some animals go though ALOT of trouble to raise a cub or something. They will not be the fittest if they wast time raising young 

where to begin with reproduction , ? lets go evolutions tale first , eggs , from dinosaurs , this carried onto reptiles and birds , and insects wheras mammals a later species gestated the young internally ,

so can you now give the anti evolution view ? cheers

mammals are the longest in term of parenting I find , this is because their young take longer to develop to a point where they are able to fend for themselves , this btw is why we as mammals love , its a chemical reaction to instill the long term bonds required to pend years rearing their kids , yep love is a sign of evolution

Perhaps you should comprehend the evolution from the practical experience.

I saw in the tv show that there is a family with six fingers in all its family members. Each one of their fingers is properly functioning.

We see it as a cause of mutation. This mutation was inherited to their descendant.

I belief the new organs could emerge in this way. And it could be the one of representation of the creations. 

Yes, that would make much more scene 

But can you get any new kind of DNA from a mutation? Or just the same DNA mixed up. I mean could a fish mutate into a mammal?

lol yeah, I know what you mean. But hey, its no secret they like to multiply

So, back to that link subject I brought up earlier on. You mentioned that an experiment took place that weighed a mans soul before, and right after death.

Curios as to what your conclusions were on it, nothing more..

there was this scientist that tried to weigh a mans soul. he got a reading and published his findings, but it turned out a bunch of ghosts had tampered with the weighing mechanism. science just ain’t what it’s cracked up to be.