Any intelligent life here to talk about chess? Especially Mathematicians and Physicists

Sort:
valeria_suarez_10

https://lichess.org/practice

valeria_suarez_10

https://lichess.org/training/mateIn5

valeria_suarez_10

https://lichess.org/training

nik1111

Once read on "Quora" post written by some physicist sci. Dr. how by just starting to excercise math, he raised his IQ from 120 to 150 and then, by playing chess raised to 190. By some strange reason post dissapeared after some time...

654Psyfox

nik1111

Specific was that he mentioned that after "excercising", it seemed to him that he's starting to think "more clearly"...

valeria_suarez_10

https://lichess.org/training/themes

valeria_suarez_10

If you answer these 3 questions correctly and solve them in 1 hour maximum and without help, you probably have an IQ higher than 145,

chessterd5

36) d 37) G 39) I don't know

valeria_suarez_10

CraigIreland

37.H, 36.F, 39.C

victorious4ever
valeria_suarez_10 wrote:

At the beginning of the game, no one knows how it will end if both play perfectly, 1. if white always wins, 2. either black always wins, or 3. it would be a draw, 1 of these scenarios is true in a perfect game , but not all 3 at the same time,

So, in the 24th TCEC tournament the superfinal was Stockfish vs LcZero, at 100 games taking turns 50 as white and 50 as black, the results for Stockfish were
+ 20 = 64 - 16, which means 20 wins, 64 draws, and 16 losses,
1. if he played perfectly he would have at least 50 wins as white in the first scenario, which white always wins, ruled out.
2. if he played perfectly he would have 50 wins as black, discarded,
3. I would never lose in the third scenario, in which if both played perfectly it would be a draw, discarded,

Stockfish Doesn't Play Perfectly, Proven

Hate to say it, but perfect play doesnt necessarily mean a draw. But I agree that stockfish is not perfect

CraigIreland
valeria_suarez_10 wrote:

If you answer these 3 questions correctly and solve them in 1 hour maximum and without help, you probably have an IQ higher than 145,

Is it safe to infer that you spent one hour on them, got them wrong, and scored 145 on the IQ test?

00DanteAleph00

Seguro.

IanShawDulin

Y tu que coeficiente intelectual tienes, Valeria? Tu que empezaste este tema y parece ser que te las das de super, super, super inteligente.

00DanteAleph00

Your demostration about why Stokfish is not perfect has not even defined what perfect is and if you are studying math you would understand that you need to define everything.

After that you without any definition say that if X plays and win 50 games atleast then it is perfect. And you also dont know about some details. Let see there is a say that every perfect chess game resolved will be a draw, because a win of either black or white is in fact because one or other made the last mistake. So you are making asumptions not proven.

Also as your definition of perfect is really ambiguous it aslo can be really obvious ans since that it can be barely just like an axiom where : "Every system is not perfect or every game is not perfect"_ No even need of proof

00DanteAleph00

Also you are saying that you are trying to find a way to play perfectly with bishop, king and queen. hahahaha. You really? You probably say that ecause your low ELO or lack of chess experience but in fact every engine and advanced chess player could find whatever method pore effective that yours.

00DanteAleph00

And chess was already resolved by engines if you didnt know that.

The only reason why actually even the most powerfull engines does not play it perfectly is because literally they dont have enough power to calcualte efvery move until the end.

And you are also wrong assuming that chess can be translated to math theorems and axioms to solve it . It is simple dumb because math theorems are quiet and chess, for playing chess you first need to know the move of your oponent, and it can change very time. So is impossible to even try to make an equation or algorithm that can solve chess according to the move of the oponent, simple,... because you dont know what he will play in the future and that is not then like a theorem that is definitive by definition. In that sense the only thing that we can do is to calculate every possible move that the oponent can do with the engines and according with that the engine will play until perfection. Ofc it can not be abosulte perfect as actual engines can improve more even with that amazing strenght. But it will be perfect in a matter of years and will be completelly solved as it is alreadY done.

valeria_suarez_10

Actually there are 39 questions, for 40 minutes, and if he answers them correctly, he tells you that he has an IQ higher than 145, I only took the 3 most difficult ones, and I said that they are for 1 hour, to give them hope that you probably have an IQ 145,
The source is from a MENSA test, Denmark, google it as MENSA Denmark, it is a test that calculates intelligence G, general intelligence, it has a dispersion of 15 standard deviation

JosiahForReal22
I don’t believe chess can simply be solved