https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfcYhJb2l3U
Any intelligent life here to talk about chess? Especially Mathematicians and Physicists
this is a thesis of degree of mathematics of the University on chess
https://www.um.es/documents/118351/1884002/TFG_PEREZ+GONZALEZ.pdf/373824ff-a05e-496f-89ce-d7a58fb99faa
in this video he interviews Magnus,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eW6Eagr9XA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVK_i7arszw

in this video he interviews Magnus,
Una pregunta seria, cuantos años tiene? es un niño o un viejo disfrazado? Lo pregunto porque no se si tal vez este siendo duro con lo veraz que soy sobre su aparente ignorancia.
game 1 and 2 of the tournament 24 TCEC superfinal, classic, 120' +12". They take turns openings, equitable.
Stockfsih lost to LC zero as Black, and failed to win as White,
handicap for black or stockfish played badly or both?
game 19 and 20 of the TCEC Superfinal Tournament 24. Classic 120' + 12".
they take turns openings, fair, stockfish loses with black, and fails to win with white,
Disadvantage of the black pieces or played badly?
game 29 and 30 of the TCEC Superfinal Tournament 24. Classic 120' + 12".
they take turns openings, equitable , stockfish loses with black, and fails to win with white,
Disadvantage of the black pieces or played badly?
game 37 and 38 of the TCEC Superfinal Tournament 24. Classic 120' + 12".
they take turns openings, equitable , stockfish loses with black, and fails to win with white,
Disadvantage of the black pieces or played badly?
Etc, if the black pieces were disadvantaged enough to lose by the opening, then why didn't stockfish win with white pieces?
And if the black pieces weren't handicapped enough to lose, then why did stockfish lose?

The Black pieces have small disadvantage, we don't know yet if that's big enough for White to win with perfect play. Most of the most influential players believe it's not. Stockfish isn't perfect so we can't draw a conclusion from its failure to achieve a draw. However these matches are valuable additions to the training set for future iterations of the engine.

TCEC is far from perfect play; the actual reference for cutting edge skill in chess is computerized correspondence.
Por fin, gente inteligente, no como el círculo social que tengo sólo oara no parecer in raro
?
No es gente inteligente, es gente con amplio acceso a la informacion debido al auge del internet y a los videos en linea. Solamente copian y pegan sistematicamente ideas que tomaron de un sitio , las hacen pasar por suyas o llegan al extremo del infantilismo de cree que son inteligentes , que son expertos, que tienen titulos,..etc, aun cuando todo su discurso es repetido , falaz y no racional.
Un ejemplo claro de eso es la persona detras de "valeria_suarez10, seguro no es una niña sino un viejo inutil o otra persona .