13788 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I was curious if anybody here has read Chess Informant in the last year or so? I've seen all this advertising of new columns, one of which done by Kasparov himself, and all sorts of other gadgets they claim. I also hear it's been moved from 3 to 4 times a year. If anybody has read volume 113 or later, can you answer a couple of questions?
1) Is it better than the early 2000s? I have volumes 89, 90, 91, and 96.
2) What are these new "sections"? Volumes 89 thru 91 (the one time I did a 1-year subscription), it was a brief article in the beginning dealing with the best of the previous issue, then about 300 symbol-annotated games, then a few problems (Combinations, Endings, etc), and lastly statistical data from recent tournaments. What's different than that today?
3) Would you recommend today's format of informant for someone that's 2100? When I read the older format back when I was about 1900, I found myself asking more questions than finding answers with the analysis.
i have volume 112. it's pretty decent.
It's okay - additional articles are some thematic analysis + opening analysis + old games. You should pick one and see if you find it stimulating.
I haven't seen any recent Informants but before you buy anything you might want to check out http://chessbase-shop.com/en/categories/50 and http://www.newinchess.com/Magazine/Default.aspx?PageID=100
I subscribed to New In Chess (NIC) magazine years ago and was very impressed. I stopped subscribing because I didn't have time to read it and I already have lots of unread chess books in my libray. I also have ChessBase magazine (on DVD) #s 113-115 that came with some other software and it also looks like it's well worth the money - if you have the money and the time to read it.
Thanks everyone. I'll have to browse an informant when I go to the Chicago Open in 3 1/2 weeks. If I find anybody with a NIC magazine, I'll have to look at one and see how good they are. I do have ChessBase magazine, numbers 141 thru 146. I got quite a bit out of the 6 part Winawer video for White (I play 1.d4, but I do usually respond to 1...e6 with 2.e4, transposing to the French), and some interesting games were found, but I couldn't really maximize the potential as I do about 75% of my studying over the board rather than on a computer, and killing every tree in the forest is also somewhat annoying. Trying to maintain all that paper is impossible, and so if you want to go back to an article or game and go thru things you think you missed the first time you have to re-print.
As for NIC Magazine, I'll have to see what is included in one issue to see if it would be of interest. I can tell you that Chess Life (The USCF's magazine) is "Utter Cr*p". Coverage of tournaments is months late and minimal. You get maybe 6 to 8 games (maybe 1 or 2 annotated) across a 60-page magazine. And then you get a whole bunch of advertising. Reading Chess Life magazine has the feel of reading a porn magazine from the 1990s. For every pic, there were 4 pages of 1-900 numbers advertised (or 1-800 numbers that lead to 1-900 numbers). Not a good ratio!
I can tell you that Chess Life (The USCF's magazine) is "Utter Cr*p". Coverage of tournaments is months late and minimal. You get maybe 6 to 8 games (maybe 1 or 2 annotated) across a 60-page magazine. And then you get a whole bunch of advertising. Reading Chess Life magazine has the feel of reading a porn magazine from the 1990s. For every pic, there were 4 pages of 1-900 numbers advertised (or 1-800 numbers that lead to 1-900 numbers). Not a good ratio!
I'm a lifetime member and told them to stop sending it many years ago and haven't missed it at all.
Not as good as it used to be (because fewer authors are sending them stuff now), but still quite decent if you like annotated games.
Natalia_Pogonina, are you referring to New in Chess Magazine, or Chess Informant?
Morphy vs. Modern GMs
by Teichmann70 120 seconds ago
Have you ever actually improved your Tactics Trainer rating?
by Ashvapathi 3 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by darwinc2007 3 minutes ago
Why Knowing Your Openings is Important at Higher Levels!
by CrimsonKnight7 4 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by isaacnewt 7 minutes ago
8/26/2016 - Kouatly - Tsheshkovsky, Hoogovens 1988
by Arisktotle 13 minutes ago
about probable cheating in chess.
by PositionalMaestro 29 minutes ago
How to climb up from 1500 rating level
by PositionalMaestro 34 minutes ago
Mikhail Tal tv interview 1988
by Teichmann70 42 minutes ago
why no chess in Olympics
by Teichmann70 43 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!