I thought it was about learning the process of the principles.
anyone can be a super GM
Sort:
I thought it was principally about learning from the process.
I thought it was about learning the processes from the school principle.
I'm particularly concerned about participation of the principled process, unless it's precariously peculiar.
FelixPlatypus wrote:
winer! your post is like a turd in a jeweller's window!
This is what c.c should be about.
NelsonAlgren wrote:
gowtham15 wrote:
I have often noticed that whenever I teach my friends chess, some of them pick up the rules and concepts very quickly and others can't even remember how the pieces move. . . .
Winning at chess is not about learning the rules of chess; it is about learning the principles of winning.
yea you aren't going to win if you don't learn the rules of chess.. how you can say that learning the chess rules isn't about winning is beyond reason.
FelixPlatypus wrote:
winer! your post is like a turd in a jeweller's window!
Ditto
May 8, 2013
0
#669
So ?????? - just how many Carats does a turd have to be to get into a Jeweller's window
It has to be one special turd. A turd so awsome history will claim it as unique and powerful!
Not to mention, beautiful.
And steaming.
Believe it or not, chess sets have been made out of dung.
I don't believe just anyone could become a super gm. The person needs to have the commitment of devotion, extremely high relevant aptitude, strong interest in chess, and probably much more.
This is not to say you can't do it. Perhaps you have all of the important factors needed to be a super gm.
waynet wrote:
Perhaps you have all of the important factors needed to be a super gm.
Like brains...I'm out.
Conflagration_Planet wrote:
Believe it or not, chess sets have been made out of dung.
Some threads are full of it, too.
A lot of people claim anything is possible. But we have to remember that because "anything" is possible does not mean "everything" is possible. Ratings are based on how much ahead of the average players are. If everyone starts being a GM, then that would just mean that the standard of being a GM would go up.
Sounds logical.
I thought it was about learning the processes of victory!