At what elo are you no longer a bad player?
Sort:
HOW IS THIS POST STILL KINDA ACTIVE IT'S BEEN LIKE 2 YEARS
Dec 13, 2024
0
#265
if that's the case how come I'm 424 elo but I beat a 2200 master from the bots?
Online I’d say 1400 is considered good
Dec 13, 2024
0
#268
you are always a bad players, all players are inherently bad, cause nobody plays their own chess, all look at the computer lines or some gotham video, which is just computer lines with some screaming, and you try to emulate that, chess is dead, computers won and there is no human part of it left, except for blunders
People are getting confused with Worst, bad, good, and perfect.
A very subjective question.
Probably better to look at the percentile, surely if you're in the top third then it would be fair to say you are "no longer a bad player"
No doubt many would disagree.
whiteknight1968 wrote:
A very subjective question.
Probably better to look at the percentile, surely if you're in the top third then it would be fair to say you are "no longer a bad player"
No doubt many would disagree.
The issue is chess.com is curved towards beginners more than lichess and otb obviously is skewed towards higher ranked players
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
whiteknight1968 wrote:
A very subjective question.
Probably better to look at the percentile, surely if you're in the top third then it would be fair to say you are "no longer a bad player"
No doubt many would disagree.
The issue is chess.com is curved towards beginners more than lichess and otb obviously is skewed towards higher ranked players
If 90% of all players on chess.com are bad players, which seems to be a reasonable guess, then the top third is 70% bad players, if my maths is correct.
Dec 29, 2024
0
#276
it depends who you compare yourself to!
even magnus carlsen is a bad player if you compare him to an engine.
Where did My posy go
Dec 31, 2024
0
#278
Only thing that matters is that you don’t have blunders, mistakes, and misses in most games then you’re pretty good.
Alexander29114 wrote:
Only thing that matters is that you don’t have blunders, mistakes, and misses in most games then you’re pretty good.
"Blunders, mistakes, and misses" are not even a real thing. Those are only used by chess.com for their dumb "Game review".
Also, every chess player makes mistakes in almost every game. Very very occasionally some masters play a perfect game, but that's incredibly rare.
Over the board!