BAD PLAYERS PLAYING BAD PLAYERS

Sort:
lmdennis

Especially in low Elo, Queen's will come and go. If you focus on making threats and keeping your pieces protected, you may find that you can still win some games

beastAra123

Dude, if u lose ur queen, keep in mind that they are 100 elo people and can make blunders and WILL make blunders after they get haughty about the queen u lost

beastAra123

It happens in our elo ranges only, too much ego my opponent got, i checkmated him in 1 move, with a rook

LOSTATCHESS

don't quite understand what beastara123 is saying ? I am missing his point I think

Mid-KnightRider
Dantex00 wrote:

Can I ask you. Why the hell are you that bad, even afte ratleast what? one year of chess , as what I can see your account creation? You are terrible.

My man you have 2000+games. Your bullet is the same as you rapid. Funny thing is people giving you opening ideas. It is like you have not even passed your first try to chess. Why.. tell me why

I am quite sure that was not needed, perhaps it is because when he asks for advice on how to get better, people like you think trolling is more fun.

Mid-KnightRider
LOSTATCHESS wrote:

for most people you are right -- but for me losing my queen early the game is a 90 % for sure I will lose -- what I can learn from that continuing to play, after my queen is gone is how stupid I was losing my queen ,nothing more usually the odd time that I continue on and win is because the other person blundered out landishly and really therefore is him/her losing the game not me winning

Then practice defending losing positions, Gotham's advice for people like you is to never resign, your opponent could very well blunder theirs.

ZacPaton
The lessons and puzzles are very valuable
marklovejoy

I looked over your loss to akash64436224. Here's things I noted; I hope this will help.

By your second move you had lost a pawn and had brought out your Queen as the first developed piece. The danger in doing that is what you pointed out: losing such a powerful piece is a losing event. But you swapped Queens early. I used to do that; in recapturing, my opponent lost the castling privilege. BUT in the endgame, when you have to centralize your King, my opponent's King was already closer to the center than mine. I had to use two or more moves to get mine in the game, giving my opponent time to go on the attack.

You need to use center pawns and minor pieces to control the center. Knights must be closer to it in order to do that. But by developing your Knights to the second rank they 1) couldn't affect the center as well as if they'd been played to the third rank. The center pawns had disappeared early, leaving a gaping hole in your position. 2) When the Knights are developed to the c6 and f6 squares they help guard the a7 and h7 ones. This relieves the King from defending h7 and taking a move to guard a7 when castling long (putting him in danger both times).

White's play wasn't flawless. The moves 5...Qxe1+; 6 Nxe1 and 7 Nc3 meant White spending three moves to put the Knight back on c3 starting with 5 Nc3

Your 15...Rad8 left a Knight unprotected. Both players overlooked 16 Rxe5.

Gradually White's ability to attack was greater than your ability to defend.

I've never played anything other than Daily Chess so I have no experience dealing with this kind of time pressure. If there are any typos in here I offer my apologies. I was doing this after 3:00 a.m.5/26/25. I work third shift.

LOSTATCHESS

Your observations were spot on, and you are correct, I was, however, trying an opening I saw on u tube about bringing out the queen early to protect the king and well, like you said, it didn't work.it seems what you see on u tube by excellent players never translate in to usable play for lowlifes like me , they never seems to go as is shown by them, always a misstep or mistake. thanks for the input and advice i will read you post just before my next game - i take the 24 hour games serious when i play the five min games are just throwaways to wait for another move to been on one of my 24 hour games i really try different things there as more of a fun thing -- then apply what i think will work into my 24 hour games ------ how ever most times it doesn't work maybe one of these days something will work --- who knows

marklovejoy

You're welcome. There's a player with an avatar (blue, with I think two vertical yellow bars in it-he probably posted in this thread) who gives great advice in his post.

marklovejoy

Post #8.

LOSTATCHESS

OK THANKS

NoemiS05
LOSTATCHESS wrote:

Your observations were spot on, and you are correct, I was, however, trying an opening I saw on u tube about bringing out the queen early to protect the king and well, like you said, it didn't work.it seems what you see on u tube by excellent players never translate in to usable play for lowlifes like me , they never seems to go as is shown by them, always a misstep or mistake. thanks for the input and advice i will read you post just before my next game - i take the 24 hour games serious when i play the five min games are just throwaways to wait for another move to been on one of my 24 hour games i really try different things there as more of a fun thing -- then apply what i think will work into my 24 hour games ------ how ever most times it doesn't work maybe one of these days something will work --- who knows

If bringing out the Queen early is a "Book Move" - part of known good opening theory - then it's perfectly fine. In the Scandinavian Defense, Black captures back early with the Queen on move 2, for example. But the general rules like "Don't bring your Queen out early" work very well once you run out of memorised moves and don't know exactly what to do next.

Gottfried94

No offence but you don't have an opening problem, your problem is that you can't play chess and playing x games every day where you just push your pieces forward without thinking doesn't add to your experience, that's why you aren't improving. 
Like I said somewhere before, go to youtube, find more about chess principles and basic ideas. In every game, you need to have a plan you'll be working towards. You can't just push everything forward or jump around with your queen hoping miracle will happen.

LOSTATCHESS

Are you looking at my 24 hour games?? I take seriously the 5-minute games I play mindlessly, waiting for a 24-hour to pop up. Please look at my 24-hour games to make criticisms I do appreciate them even as you say I not very smart --- by the way what is a x games ???????

DanaHarris07

1. Stop quitting when you're losing. You can learn a lot even from games you've lost. Analyse previous games to see where you went wrong and what you could have done better. 2. Study one opening for now and use it in all games when possible so you can get better at it. For me learning theory really helped because you can seldom go wrong if you play a book move. 3. Think about changing your name; mindset really contributes to your performance in chess. If you keep telling yourself that you're gonna lose, that's probably what's gonna happen. Hope that helps:)

LOSTATCHESS

i appreciate the input you gave -- thanks for the time

kitemyy

imagine losing to martin.............

Acrobatic-Insect202

Can I see an example of one of your games? I'm almost 200 and won most of mine by resignation cry

LOSTATCHESS

well just click on any of my 24-hour games to see an example of my play