Beginner rating after 2 months

That's pretty normal.

Your first 100 games are mostly about getting used to all the rules (including tricky ones like castling, en passant, pawn promotion, and things like stalemate).

And getting used to trying to visualize your intended move to check whether it's safe.

I looked at a few of your games. It's the usual stuff like being more focused on your potential threats than what your opponent's last move actually is threatening, not placing a high enough value on opening principals during the first 10 or so moves, and not placing a high enough value on saving your own material.

You certainly seem to know the point values (like 1,3,3,5,9) and you seem to know about development, and of course you're checking whether your moves are safe, but I'm saying what will help you improve is doing these things more consistently.

For example

Ugh, chess.com ate some of post, I'll try again

I think that a lot depends on the specifics of what one does during the two months.

i was around 850 two months ago, now I am around 950, after 200 gsmes, so an avarage of 0,25 points for each played game.

I started doing tactics and my blitz rating went up 140 and climbing in 30 days. check my profile. do more tactics!!!!!

I was not rated as a kid, nor did I know about ratings. I was under 1000, based on what little I knew. worrying about 700 ratings is a phenomena for those who start as adults. I would not worry too much.

I started playing rapid chess 35 days ago. My rating tanked at around 500, now I am at 1000

Answering this a bit too late but I guess it depends how much time goes into chess here because of vacations after the quarantine  I started playing chess and got a rating of over 1000 in about 1 month and a half so I would say average is 1000+ if you put in some time into chess over the months.

As @CactusIV said, even though I might be late, I think it depends on how you play, not the number of games. If I were you I would learn different tactics, basic openings, and would start doing puzzles everyday. I started off as a 650 about 1-2 months ago now I am averaging at 1050

I started off at 600, my rating dropped to around 350( a good chunk of my losses are internet connection related)in December. I wasn't very consistent with playing due to school so in lapsed time ive been playing for 4 months but really more like 2, my rating has been on a pretty steady climb since the middle of March with me massing 250+ points in rapid. It really comes down to a combo of talent and how much you play. Lately ive been playing a minimum of 12 games a week. I've found that playing really aggressively will result in a mate or a resignation. 

i am playing for month and played 150 rapid games and my rating is 504.. Any tips for me??

I started playing chess again after 5 years cause someone from discord asked who knows chess and i replied. I got rekt because i was blundering, but since then I improved ig

I think becoming careful about knight forks, hanging pieces - these things come with time. For example, I don't often hang on Rapid anymore (just reached 1200) and has some games with great accuracy (often <20 moves where the opponent blunders a lot) or >50 moves where it often becomes best move is the only way to survive). But in bullet and sometimes blitz, the time pressure become a legit issue and those things still happen.

I think in first two months of regular playing, it's fine to be around 600-700. I was there a long time.

My advice (and get faster at this as you get more experienced and especially in time controls it's pivotal)

For Defence:
Is your King under threat in the next 1-2 moves?

Is your Queen under threat in the next 1-2 moves?

Where is the Knight? Can it fork two pieces (especially a king) either through it's move or mine - seriously I try to get the Knights off the board the fastest possible.

Check the possible discovered threats in the bishop lines (I lost many a rook cause I didn't see that moving the b2/g2 pawn (for white) or b7/g7 pawn (for black) often leaves your rook unprotected.

For Attack:
I think I am still very weak and feel I am better with black and reacting rather than active

This will be a bit more problematic to learn and I am seriously complete novice at this.

Become 'decent' at certain openings (I use Modern or Queen's Gambit to give my Queen side breathing space and start attacking the King's side. Sometimes I might castle Queen side to throw the opposition off balance.)

Become better at linking 2 or 3 pieces to coordinate. It becomes very important to know what you are protecting. Do not try to attack just because you can. 

And obviously, some things - if you are down a piece, don't trade (doesn't help in bullet much). And up a piece, try to trade unless you see some checkmating patterns. Try to take as many pawns as possible before you exchange pieces.

Easier said than done I know (bullet really screws you up. So many M1s missed under time pressure.)

I have played almost 300 games at the time of writing this. I am 880 rapid. 100 games should improve your rating if you are learning tactics and anaylsing your games. However, you shouldn't expect to go from 600 elo - 1300 elo in 100 games. Almost nobody can do that. I would say look at where you started. If you have improved your rating from the starting point, that shows you are getting better, and that's what matters.

sry but kind of slow

I got to 700 in 3 days