Best Books! Recommendations Please

Sort:
Avatar of Chris_the_Diabetic

Sitting in my Amazon cart right now are 'Modern Chess Openings; 15th ed.' by Nick De Firmian & 'Silman's Endgame Course'.

 

Can anyone purpose something they feel to be an invaluable chess book? Keep in mind I am only ~1000 elo.  Thanks everyone! 

Avatar of kindaspongey

"... MCO-15 pretends to be everything for everybody, but it isn’t; it pretends to be up-to-date and relevant in all chapters, but it isn’t; it should be a good book, but it isn’t. ..."

And that was about a decade ago.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140626165820/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen110.pdf

"... For new players, I cannot recommend books that use [an encyclopedic] type of presentation [of opening theory], because the explanatory prose that elaborates typical plans and ideas is usually absent, thus leaving the student without any clear idea why certain moves are played or even preferred over other apparently equivalent moves. ..." - FM Carsten Hansen (2010)

"... For beginning players, [Discovering Chess Openings by GN John Emms] will offer an opportunity to start out on the right foot and really get a feel for what is happening on the board. ..." - FM Carsten Hansen (2006)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627114655/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen91.pdf
Two other introductions to openings are Openings for Amateurs by Pete Tamburro (2014)
http://kenilworthian.blogspot.com/2014/05/review-of-pete-tamburros-openings-for.html
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/openings-for-amateurs/
https://www.mongoosepress.com/catalog/excerpts/openings_amateurs.pdf
and Winning Chess Openings by GM Yasser Seirawan (~1999).
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627132508/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen173.pdf

"... Once you identify an opening you really like and wish to learn in more depth, then should you pick up a book on a particular opening or variation. Start with ones that explain the opening variations and are not just meant for advanced players. ..." - Dan Heisman (2001)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140626180930/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/heisman06.pdf
"... I feel that the main reasons to buy an opening book are to give a good overview of the opening, and to explain general plans and ideas. ..." - GM John Nunn (2006)
"... If the book contains illustrative games, it is worth playing these over first ..." - GM John Nunn (2006)
"... the average player only needs to know a limited amount about the openings he plays. Providing he understands the main aims of the opening, a few typical plans and a handful of basic variations, that is enough. ..." - FM Steve Giddins (2008)
"... For inexperienced players, I think the model that bases opening discussions on more or less complete games that are fully annotated, though with a main focus on the opening and early middlegame, is the ideal. ..." - FM Carsten Hansen (2010)
"... Everyman Chess has started a new series aimed at those who want to understand the basics of an opening, i.e., the not-yet-so-strong players. ... I imagine [there] will be a long series based on the premise of bringing the basic ideas of an opening to the reader through plenty of introductory text, game annotations, hints, plans and much more. ..." - FM Carsten Hansen (2002)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627055734/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen38.pdf
"The way I suggest you study this book is to play through the main games once, relatively quickly, and then start playing the variation in actual games. Playing an opening in real games is of vital importance - without this kind of live practice it is impossible to get a 'feel' for the kind of game it leads to. There is time enough later for involvement with the details, after playing your games it is good to look up the line." - GM Nigel Davies (2005)

Avatar of kindaspongey
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of kindaspongey
Clenzen wrote:

... 'Silman's Endgame Course'. ...

"... I'm convinced that Silman's [Complete Endgame Course] will take its place in history as one of the most popular endgame books ever. ... He writes in a clear and casual style, and time and again has shown the ability to reach those who feel intimidated by the lofty approach that a grandmaster will often take. ..." - IM John Watson (2007)

http://theweekinchess.com/john-watson-reviews/theres-an-end-to-it-all

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708103149/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review594.pdf

Avatar of kindaspongey
Clenzen wrote:

... Can anyone purpose something they feel to be an invaluable chess book? Keep in mind I am only ~1000 elo. ...

Possibly of interest:
Simple Attacking Plans by Fred Wilson (2012)https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090402/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review874.pdf
http://dev.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/Simple-Attacking-Plans-77p3731.htm
Logical Chess: Move by Move by Irving Chernev (1957)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104437/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/logichess.pdf
The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by Irving Chernev (1965)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/most-instructive-games-of-chess-ever-played/
Winning Chess by Irving Chernev and Fred Reinfeld (1948)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708093415/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review919.pdf
Back to Basics: Tactics by Dan Heisman (2007)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708233537/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review585.pdf
https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-back-to-basics-tactics

A Guide to Chess Improvement by Dan Heisman (2010)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708105628/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review781.pdf
Studying Chess Made Easy by Andrew Soltis (2009)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090448/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review750.pdf
Seirawan stuff:
http://seagaard.dk/review/eng/bo_beginner/ev_winning_chess.asp?KATID=BO&ID=BO-Beginner
http://www.nystar.com/tamarkin/review1.htm

https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-winning-chess-endings

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708092617/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review560.pdf

Avatar of RoobieRoo

Rampant Chess by Chandler and Ruxton, a truly fantastic read, forget all those ancient tomes posted by spongey, get a chess book that you will actually enjoy reading.  Best ten bucks you will ever spend on over sixty chess lessons.

http://www.chess4less.com/rampant-chess---geoff-chandler-and-keith-ruxton.html

Avatar of IMKeto
Clenzen wrote:

Sitting in my Amazon cart right now are 'Modern Chess Openings; 15th ed.' by Nick De Firmian & 'Silman's Endgame Course'.

 

Can anyone purpose something they feel to be an invaluable chess book? Keep in mind I am only ~1000 elo.  Thanks everyone! 

Definite thumbs up on Silmans book.  

I would pass on MCO for now.  An opening book is not what you need at this time.

I would get a good tactics book like: 1001 Chess Exercises for Beginners.

Also..."Logical Chess Move by Move" by Chernov.

Avatar of RoobieRoo

DON'T GO NEAR Silman, he will wreck your progress with jive talk about imbalances and rooks on half open files and Knights v Bishops in positions with pawns on one side of the board. wink.png

Avatar of kindaspongey
Clenzen wrote: "Sitting in my Amazon cart right now ... 'Silman's Endgame Course'. ..."
robbie_1969 wrote:

DON'T GO NEAR Silman, he will wreck your progress with jive talk about imbalances and rooks on half open files and Knights v Bishops in positions with pawns on one side of the board. wink.png

How much of that does one see in the section designed for beginners or the section for 1000-1199 players?

"... if you have just learned to play, all you need to study is the section designed for beginners (Part One). After mastering the material there, put [Silman's Complete Endgame Course] away ... once you feel you've improved and reached a higher rating/skill level, it will be time to ... move on the next series of endgame lessons. ..." - IM Jeremy Silmam (2007)

Avatar of Kmatta
robbie_1969 wrote:

DON'T GO NEAR Silman, he will wreck your progress with jive talk about imbalances and rooks on half open files and Knights v Bishops in positions with pawns on one side of the board.

He wants the Endgame Course, Not Reasses Your Chess

Avatar of RoobieRoo
Kmatta wrote:

He wants the Endgame Course, Not Reasses Your Chess

my gawd its worse than I thought.

Avatar of RoobieRoo
kindaspongey wrote:

How much of that does one see in the section designed for beginners or the section for 1000-1199 players?

 

how much, i dunno, i read the insufferable tomes ages ago, point is, if i had enjoyed them I would have remembered, but i didn’t so my advice is solid, get a book you will enjoy.

Avatar of IMKeto
robbie_1969 wrote:
kindaspongey wrote:

How much of that does one see in the section designed for beginners or the section for 1000-1199 players?

 

how much, i dunno, i read the insufferable tomes ages ago, point is, if i had enjoyed them I would have remembered, but i didn’t so my advice is solid, get a book you will enjoy.

Just because you didnt enjoy the book, doesnt mean the OP wont.

Avatar of RoobieRoo
FishEyedFools wrote:

Just because you didnt enjoy the book, doesnt mean the OP wont.

Right and just because you like wearing jaggy nettle underpants and flagellating yourself with the reassess your chess work book means that the OP is going to enjoy the same. wink.png  Come now Fishy are we not allowed to express our own experience with these publications?  Is it completely invalid? Meaningless to anyone but is?

Avatar of IMKeto
robbie_1969 wrote:
FishEyedFools wrote:

Just because you didnt enjoy the book, doesnt mean the OP wont.

Right and just because you like wearing jaggy nettle underpants and flagellating yourself with the reassess your chess work book means that the OP is going to enjoy the same.

lol...I have no idea what you said clothing wise.  I never read Reasess You Chess, so i cant comment on that.  But i did study his endgame book.  I would highly recommend it.  But at the end of the day, the OP will have to decide.

Avatar of RoobieRoo

You enjoyed the endgame book? It is meant to be one of his more serious efforts.  If you enjoyed it then tis enough, maybe the OP will also find it enjoyable, I agree.  You don't have jaggy nettles in the USA? Stinging nettles perhaps you call them? Here they grow everywhere.

Avatar of IMKeto
robbie_1969 wrote:

You enjoyed the endgame book? It is meant to be one of his more serious efforts.  If you enjoyed it then tis enough, maybe the OP will also find it enjoyable, I agree.  You don't have jaggy nettles in the USA? Stinging nettles perhaps you call them? Here they grow everywhere.

Stinging nettles i have heard of.

Avatar of jambyvedar

The Complete Idiot's Guide to Chess. At your level, this book will teach you the general things about openings,tactics,strategies and endgames that you need to know.

Avatar of kindaspongey
Clenzen wrote: "Sitting in my Amazon cart right now ... 'Silman's Endgame Course'. ..."
Robbie_1969 wrote: "DON'T GO NEAR Silman, he will wreck your progress with jive talk about imbalances and rooks on half open files and Knights v Bishops in positions with pawns on one side of the board. wink.png"
robbie_1969 wrote:
kindaspongey wrote:

How much of that does one see in the section designed for beginners or the section for 1000-1199 players? ...

how much, i dunno, ...

So, maybe none?

Avatar of kindaspongey
Clenzen wrote: "Sitting in my Amazon cart right now ... 'Silman's Endgame Course'. ..."
Robbie_1969 wrote: "... i read the insufferable tomes ages ago, point is, if i had enjoyed them I would have remembered, but i didn’t so my advice is solid, get a book you will enjoy."
robbie_1969 wrote:
FishEyedFools wrote:

Just because you didnt enjoy the book, doesnt mean the OP wont.

Right and just because you like wearing jaggy nettle underpants and flagellating yourself with the reassess your chess work book means that the OP is going to enjoy the same. wink.png ...

In this thread, who is suggesting the reassess your chess work book?