Yes and no. The best annotated games collection I own (and I own quite a lot) is the 25-game collection by the GM Robert Huebner. Twenty-five games covered in over 400 pages of very deep analysis!
The depth of analysis is much greater than in Fischer's My 60 Memorable Games. On the other hand, Fischer's book does have the high emotional content, especially when he comments on his opponents' behavior during the game.
The "no" comes from a simple observation that an elite player will often play over a thousand tournament games in his lifetime, and will choose only a select couple of dozen for his "best games" collection. There just isn't enough time to annotate and publish all of it. In consequence, the third party biographies play an important role in exposing the lesser known games of a GM. For example, Andy Soltis' Bobby Fischer Rediscovered covers the games which were left out of Bobby's own collection.
Could someone explain to me why publishers come up with countless books on well-known players like Kasparov for example, ie his games; but not written and annotated by the man himself. A lot of the points about the games may be good and relevant but what compulsion is there to purchase that book when actual analysis and extra insight can be given by the person who played the game? I personally am not into books which only focus on one player and their games but for people who are isn't the point to try and get inside the mind of a genius? If so why use a third party?
This applies for current elite level players like Carlsen as well. If you're interested in a detailed account of his games you would want to wait for the real thing rather than a pale imitation from a GM-for-hire trying to make a quick buck surely.